pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09628 · v1 · pith:GE7MG6ZInew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Uniaxial-Stress-Induced Magnetic Transitions in the Triangular-Lattice Antiferromagnet PdCrO2

Nina Stilkerich , Tobias Ritschel , Hilary M. L. Noad , Richard Waite , Dmitry Khalyavin , Kousuke Ishida , Pascal Manuel , Fabio Orlandi
show 5 more authors
Seunghyun Khim Elena Gati Andrew P. Mackenzie Jochen Geck Clifford W. Hicks
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 14:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords uniaxial stressmagnetic transitiontriangular lattice antiferromagnetPdCrO2elastic moduliFermi surface nestingmagnetoelastic coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Uniaxial stress induces a first-order magnetic transition in PdCrO2 that shrinks the lattice constant by 0.21% and stiffens the material substantially.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies uniaxial stress to the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO2. It finds a new magnetic transition where the lattice contracts sharply and the elastic response changes markedly. Young's modulus rises by about 80 GPa while the Poisson ratio drops from near 1 to 0.4. This shows that the magnetic order becomes locked against further strain. The authors suggest the locking arises when the new magnetic structure nests the Fermi surface of the Pd layers, and note that similar strong magnetoelastic coupling may appear in other frustrated magnets.

Core claim

A new first-order stress-induced magnetic transition occurs in PdCrO2 at which the lattice constant shrinks by 0.21%. Across the transition the Young's modulus increases by about 80 GPa and the Poisson ratio falls from about 1 to about 0.4, indicating that the magnetic order locks and becomes insensitive to lattice strain. This locking might occur because the new stress-induced magnetic order nests the Fermi surface of the Pd sheets.

What carries the argument

The stress-induced magnetic transition that locks the magnetic order and renders it insensitive to further lattice strain.

If this is right

  • The magnetic order becomes locked against lattice strain after the transition.
  • Laboratory-achievable stress can induce substantial changes in magnetic structure because the Cr-Cr interaction is sensitive to interatomic separation.
  • Other frustrated magnets, including candidate spin liquids, may show similarly strong coupling between magnetic and elastic degrees of freedom.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the nesting picture is correct, the critical stress value could be predicted from electronic-structure calculations without new experiments.
  • The large drop in Poisson ratio implies that the material becomes markedly more anisotropic under stress, which could be tested by measuring directional sound velocities across the transition.
  • Applying the same uniaxial-stress protocol to other triangular-lattice antiferromagnets would test whether Fermi-surface nesting is a general mechanism for producing such locking.

Load-bearing premise

The observed elastic stiffening results from the magnetic order locking due to Fermi-surface nesting rather than other stress-dependent electronic or structural effects.

What would settle it

A band-structure calculation or spectroscopic measurement that checks whether the new magnetic structure produces Fermi-surface nesting on the Pd sheets at the transition stress.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09628 by Andrew P. Mackenzie, Clifford W. Hicks, Dmitry Khalyavin, Elena Gati, Fabio Orlandi, Hilary M. L. Noad, Jochen Geck, Kousuke Ishida, Nina Stilkerich, Pascal Manuel, Richard Waite, Seunghyun Khim, Tobias Ritschel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Lattice directions and hypothesised spin configura￾tions under strain. (a) Schematic of a triangular lattice under uniaxial stress applied along the [210] lattice direction. J1 is the exchange energy across the bonds that get compressed (solid lines), and J2 across those that get stretched (dashed lines). The blue lines are high-symmetry lattice directions. The x, y, and z directions, used in discussion of… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Experimental information on XRD measurement under strain. (a) Setup for the X-ray diffraction measurement with detector angle ζ, cryostat rotation ω, sample rotation φ, and sample tilt χ labelled. (b) Unit cell of PdCrO2; this cell is of the obverse type. (c) A parametrisation of this cell. (d) Sum of area detector images over varying ω, focused on the 2¯2¯5 reflection. (e) Azimuthally integrated intensity… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Lattice constants a and b from XRD data, plotted against longitudinal strain εxx (i.e. the strain along [210]). (a) Lattice constants at T = 14 K. (b) Same, at T = 45 K. (c) b(εxx) from panels (a) and (b), with background slopes subtracted. The inset shows the fits performed to identify the strain range ε1 - ε2 of the new transition. In all three panels, the error bar on the x axis is the error on εxx, ±6 … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Differential Young’s modulus and Poisson ratio. (a) Differential Young’s modulus E of sample B at 15 K, and differential Poisson ratio ν of sample A at 14 K. (b) Equivalent data at 45 K. σxx (GPa) -1.0 -0.5 0 0 20 40 60 T (K) (a) new phase paramagnetic double-q single￾q 0 20 40 60 T (K) 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 approximate strain jump / 10-2 (b) sample B σ ramps T ramps double-single-q transition new transition 53… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stress-strain relationship and differential Young’s modulus. (a) Stress σxx versus strain εxx for sample B at various temperatures. (b) Differential Young’s modulus E = dσxx/dεxx for sample B at 5.0 K, with the strain ranges of the three different phases labelled. (c) Differential Young’s modulus of sample B at various temperatures. (d) Same for sample C. In all the panels, the calibration strain, −0.69 · … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase diagram. (a) Stress-temperature phase diagram of PdCrO2, derived from stress-strain data on sample B. (b) Jump in strain ∆ε at the two first-order transitions, as determined from stress-strain data on sample B. Due to artefacts introduced by the two-spring approximation, these values for ∆ε are about 70% of the true strain jumps at the transitions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Neutron scattering intensities from sample D at 8.5 K. (a) Intensities at three applied stresses, and for three cuts along the l axis. All indexing is done with respect to the unstrained lattice vectors. (b) A collage of panels (a5) and (a9). The dotted line shows the expected motion of the magnetic reflections for smooth evolution from the 120◦ spiral to N´eel order. for (¯120) domains of the double-q pha… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sample E at T = 8.6 K and σxx ≈ −0.72 GPa. (a) A cut through the l = 0.5 plane. (b) A cut along the dashed line in panel a. N´eel order would yield scattering at k ′ = 0, corresponding to (h, k) = ( 1 2 , 0). (c) A cut through the l = 2.5 plane. a b layer above layer below : : (a) (b) (120) planes (210) planes (110) planes c a b [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Possible spin configuration of an obverse (¯120) domain of the single-q phase. This structure is obtained by setting q = (0.375, −0.750, 3 2 ), and the spin planes to be the (¯120) planes, as they are for (¯120) domains of the double-q phase in unstressed PdCrO2. (b) The (¯120), (2¯10), and (110) planes— the planes contain the indicated lines and the c axis. 5. Discussion In the above, changes in the e… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Illustration of nesting. (a) The Fermi surface of PdCoO2 (a non-magnetic analogue of PdCrO2) plotted together with the magnetic Bragg planes expected from a spin spiral with (h, k) = (0.42, −0.84). The colours correspond to the real-space Bragg planes plotted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Temperature-ramp data for sample B. Cd is the differential change of the displacement capacitance with temperature when the voltage applied to the piezoelectric actuators is held constant. The points and error bars correspond to transition temperatures identified in these data. too: under high compression, the Young’s modulus derived from the increasing-compression ramp is lower than that from the decreas… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Young’s modulus E versus strain εxx, for three possible values of the calibration strain, that is, the strain at the midpoint of the new first-order transition. strain relationship from force-displacement data. The midpoint of the new first-order transition, 1 2 (ε1 + ε2), where ε1 and ε2 are the strains at either end of the transition, was selected as this calibration strain. From the XRD data, 1 2 (ε1 +… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Cuts through a the l = 0 plane and b the l = 1 plane, for sample D under stress ≈ −0.56 GPa. Intensity from the propagation vector q2 = (0.42, −0.84, 0) would appear at the intersections of the dotted lines. 9.6. Modeling In this section, a calculation is presented of the elastic moduli of a triangular antiferromagnet as it is driven through a spiral-N´eel transition by uniaxial stress, taking into accoun… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Results from a baseline model for elastic deformation across the spiral-N´eel transition. (a) Differential Young’s modulus E, and (b) Differential Poisson ratio ν. The nearest-neighbour interaction in unstressed PdCrO2 is taken to be J0 = 6 meV. Results are shown for three different assumptions of the dependence of J on interatomic separation a. For the exponential dependence, dJ/da is set to −90 meV/˚A a… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Uniaxial stress is a promising method to tune magnetic frustration, allowing its effects to be studied in a precise way. In this work, uniaxial stress is applied to the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO2. The Cr-Cr magnetic interaction is very sensitive to interatomic separation, so laboratory-achievable stress can induce substantial changes in magnetic structure. Results from three types of measurement are presented: X-ray diffraction, the stress-strain relationship, and neutron diffraction. The combined data show that the elastic moduli of PdCrO2 are strongly affected by stress-induced changes in magnetic structure. A new, first-order stress-induced magnetic transition is observed, at which the lattice constant shrinks by 0.21%. The lattice stiffens dramatically across this transition: the Young's modulus increases by about 80 GPa, and the Poisson ratio falls from about 1 to about 0.4. This stiffening indicates that the magnetic order "locks," that is, becomes insensitive to lattice strain. This locking might occur because the new stress-induced magnetic order nests the Fermi surface of the Pd sheets. Other frustrated magnets, including candidate spin liquids, may show similarly strong coupling between magnetic and elastic degrees of freedom.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a first-order uniaxial-stress-induced magnetic transition in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO2, established by combining X-ray diffraction, stress-strain curves, and neutron diffraction. At the transition the c-axis lattice constant contracts by 0.21%; the Young's modulus jumps upward by ~80 GPa while the Poisson ratio drops from ~1 to ~0.4. The elastic stiffening is interpreted as the magnetic order becoming locked to the lattice, with a possible origin in Fermi-surface nesting of the Pd sheets.

Significance. If the reported numbers and transition hold, the work provides direct experimental evidence of unusually strong magnetoelastic coupling in a frustrated magnet, where modest uniaxial stress produces both a magnetic reconfiguration and large, abrupt changes in elastic moduli. The use of three independent probes (diffraction plus mechanical response) against external standards is a clear strength and makes the central observations reproducible and falsifiable.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and discussion: the suggestion that the observed locking 'might occur because the new stress-induced magnetic order nests the Fermi surface of the Pd sheets' is stated without any explicit comparison of the magnetic propagation vector determined by neutron diffraction against calculated Pd-sheet nesting vectors. This leaves the proposed mechanism as an untested hypothesis and opens the possibility that the modulus jump arises instead from stress-dependent Cr-Cr exchange or undetected structural degrees of freedom.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and discussion: the suggestion that the observed locking 'might occur because the new stress-induced magnetic order nests the Fermi surface of the Pd sheets' is stated without any explicit comparison of the magnetic propagation vector determined by neutron diffraction against calculated Pd-sheet nesting vectors. This leaves the proposed mechanism as an untested hypothesis and opens the possibility that the modulus jump arises instead from stress-dependent Cr-Cr exchange or undetected structural degrees of freedom.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents the Fermi-surface nesting idea as a possible origin for the observed locking without performing or reporting an explicit comparison of the neutron-determined propagation vector to calculated Pd-sheet nesting vectors. The suggestion is offered as a hypothesis motivated by the known electronic structure of the Pd layers and the abrupt nature of the transition, but it is not tested within this work. We will revise the abstract and discussion to state more explicitly that the mechanism remains speculative and that alternatives, such as stress-induced changes in Cr-Cr exchange or undetected structural effects, cannot be excluded on the basis of the present data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental measurements with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental results from X-ray diffraction, stress-strain curves, and neutron diffraction on PdCrO2 under uniaxial stress. The observed first-order transition (0.21% lattice contraction), Young's modulus jump (~80 GPa), and Poisson ratio change (~1 to ~0.4) are measured quantities against external standards, not derived from fitted parameters or prior self-citations. The abstract's speculative phrasing ('might occur because... nests the Fermi surface') is an interpretation, not a load-bearing derivation or prediction that reduces to inputs by construction. No equations, ansatze, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that could create circularity. The central claims rest on independent data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper reports experimental observations without introducing new theoretical entities, free parameters, or ad-hoc axioms. The central claims rest on standard diffraction and mechanical measurement techniques.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5805 in / 1265 out tokens · 14738 ms · 2026-06-27T14:49:14.213701+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Simple Variational Wave Functions for Two-Dimensional Heisenberg Spin-1/2 Antiferromagnets.Phys

    D A Huse and V Elser. Simple Variational Wave Functions for Two-Dimensional Heisenberg Spin-1/2 Antiferromagnets.Phys. Rev. Lett., 60:2531, 1988

    1988

  2. [2]

    Phase diagram for a class of spin-1/2 Heisenberg models interpolating between the square-lattice, the triangular-lattice, and the linear-chain limits.Phys

    Z Weihong, R H McKenzie, and R P Singh. Phase diagram for a class of spin-1/2 Heisenberg models interpolating between the square-lattice, the triangular-lattice, and the linear-chain limits.Phys. Rev. B, 59:14367, 1999. Uniaxial-stress-induced magnetic transitions in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO 2 12

    1999

  3. [3]

    Spin-liquid and magnetic phases in the anisotropic triangular lattice: The case ofκ-(ET)2X.Phys

    L F Tocchio, A Parola, C Gros, and F Becca. Spin-liquid and magnetic phases in the anisotropic triangular lattice: The case ofκ-(ET)2X.Phys. Rev. B, 80:064419, 2009

    2009

  4. [4]

    Phase diagram of the anisotropic triangular lattice Hubbard model.Phys

    A Szasz and J Motruk. Phase diagram of the anisotropic triangular lattice Hubbard model.Phys. Rev. B, 103:235132, 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    Spin Liquid State in an Organic Mott Insulator with a Triangular Lattice.Phys

    Y Shimizu, K Miyagawa, K Kanoda, M Maesato, and G Saito. Spin Liquid State in an Organic Mott Insulator with a Triangular Lattice.Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:107001, 2003

    2003

  6. [6]

    Temperature dependence of structural and electronic properties of the spin-liquid candidateκ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3.Phys

    H O Jeschke, M de Souze, R Valent´ ı, R Sekhar Manna, M Lang, and J A Schlueter. Temperature dependence of structural and electronic properties of the spin-liquid candidateκ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3.Phys. Rev. B, 85:035125, 2012

    2012

  7. [7]

    Probing and tuning geometric frustration in an organic quantum magnet via elastocaloric measurements under strain.Sci

    F Lieberich, Y Saito, Y Agarmani, T Sasaki, N Yoneyama, S M Winter, M Lang, and E Gati. Probing and tuning geometric frustration in an organic quantum magnet via elastocaloric measurements under strain.Sci. Advances, 11:eadz0699, 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    La structure des substances magnetiques.J

    J Villain. La structure des substances magnetiques.J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 11(3):303–309, 1959

    1959

  9. [9]

    A new type of antiferromagnetic structure in the rutile type crystal.J

    A Yoshimori. A new type of antiferromagnetic structure in the rutile type crystal.J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 14(6):807– 821, 1959

    1959

  10. [10]

    On the 90 ◦Exchange Interaction between Cations (Cr 3+, Mn 2+, Fe 3+ and Ni2+) in Oxides.J

    K Motida and S Miyahara. On the 90 ◦Exchange Interaction between Cations (Cr 3+, Mn 2+, Fe 3+ and Ni2+) in Oxides.J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 28:1188, 1970

    1970

  11. [11]

    Magnetic interactions in PdCrO 2 and their effects on its magnetic structure.Phys

    M D Le, S Jeon, A I Kolesnikov, D J Voneshen, A S Gibbs, J S Kim, J Jeong, H-J Noh, C Park, J Yu, T G Perring, and J-G Park. Magnetic interactions in PdCrO 2 and their effects on its magnetic structure.Phys. Rev. B, 98:024429, 2018

    2018

  12. [12]

    E. V. Komleva, V. Yu. Irkhin, I. V. Solovyev, M. I. Katsnelson, and S. V. Streltsov. Unconventional magnetism and electronic state in the frustrated layered system PdCrO2.Phys. Rev. B, 102:174438, 2020

    2020

  13. [13]

    Hardy, C

    V. Hardy, C. Martin, F. Damay, and G. Andr´ e. Magnetic couplings in the quasi-2D triangular Heisenberg antifer- romagnetsα-Cr2O4 (A = Ca, Sr, Ba).J. Magn. Magn. Mat., 330:111, 2013

    2013

  14. [14]

    Quantum oscillations and magnetic reconstruction in the delafossite PdCrO2.Phys

    C W Hicks, A S Gibbs, Li Zhao, P Kushwaha, H Borrmann, A P Mackenzie, H Takatsu, S Yonezawa, Y Maeno, and E A Yelland. Quantum oscillations and magnetic reconstruction in the delafossite PdCrO2.Phys. Rev. B, 92:014425, 2015

    2015

  15. [15]

    Quantum Oscillations of the Metallic Triangular-Lattice Antiferromagnet PdCrO2.Phys

    J M Ok, Y J Jo, K Kim, T Shishidou, E S Choi, H-J Noh, T Oguchi, B I Min, and J S Kim. Quantum Oscillations of the Metallic Triangular-Lattice Antiferromagnet PdCrO2.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:176405, 2013

    2013

  16. [16]

    Direct Observation of Localized Spin Antiferromagnetic Transition in PdCrO 2 by Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy.Sci

    H-J Noh, J Jeong, B Chang, D Jeong, H S Moon, E-J Cho, J M Ok, J S Kim, K Kim, B I Min, H-K Lee, J-Y Kim, B-G Park, H-D Kim, and S Lee. Direct Observation of Localized Spin Antiferromagnetic Transition in PdCrO 2 by Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy.Sci. Rep., 4(1):3680, 2014

    2014

  17. [17]

    Probing spin correlations using angle-resolved photoemission in a coupled metallic/Mott insulator system.Sci

    V Sunko, F Mazzola, S Kitamura, S Khim, P Kushwaha, O J Clark, M D Watson, I Markovi´ c, D Biswas, L Pourovskii, T K Kim, T-L Lee, P K Thakur, H Rosner, A Georges, R Moessner, T Oka, A P Mackenzie, and P D C King. Probing spin correlations using angle-resolved photoemission in a coupled metallic/Mott insulator system.Sci. Adv., 6:eaaz0611, 2020

    2020

  18. [18]

    Unconventional Anomalous Hall Effect in the Metallic Triangular-Lattice Magnet PdCrO 2.Phys

    H Takatsu, S Yonezawa, S Fujimoto, and Y Maeno. Unconventional Anomalous Hall Effect in the Metallic Triangular-Lattice Magnet PdCrO 2.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:137201, 2010

    2010

  19. [19]

    Impact of short-range order on transport properties of the two- dimensional metal PdCrO 2.Phys

    R Daou, R Fr´ esard, S H´ ebert, and A Maignan. Impact of short-range order on transport properties of the two- dimensional metal PdCrO 2.Phys. Rev. B, 92:245115, 2015

    2015

  20. [20]

    Large anomalous Hall conductivity induced by spin chirality fluctuation in an ultraclean frustrated antiferromagnet PdCrO 2.Comm Phys., 7:162, 2024

    H-S Jeon, H-W Seo, J-H Seo, Y H Kim, E S Choi, Y-J Jo, H N Lee, J M Ok, and J S Kim. Large anomalous Hall conductivity induced by spin chirality fluctuation in an ultraclean frustrated antiferromagnet PdCrO 2.Comm Phys., 7:162, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    Critical behavior of the metallic triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet PdCrO 2.Phys

    H Takatsu, H Yoshizawa, S Yonezawa, and Y Maeno. Critical behavior of the metallic triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet PdCrO 2.Phys. Rev. B, 79:104424, 2009

    2009

  22. [22]

    Magnetic structure of the conductive triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO 2.Phys

    H Takatsu, G N´ enert, H Kadowaki, H Yoshizawa, M Enderle, S Yonezawa, Y Maeno, J Kim, N Tsuji, M Takata, Y Zhao, M Green, and C Broholm. Magnetic structure of the conductive triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO 2.Phys. Rev. B, 89:104408, 2014

    2014

  23. [23]

    Heisenberg spins on an anisotropic triangular lattice: PdCrO 2 under uniaxial stress.New J

    D Sun, D A Sokolov, R Waite, S Khim, P Manuel, F Orlandi, D D Khalyavin, A P Mackenzie, and C W Hicks. Heisenberg spins on an anisotropic triangular lattice: PdCrO 2 under uniaxial stress.New J. Phys., 23(12):123050, 2021

    2021

  24. [24]

    Sanchez, P Malinowski, J Mutch, J Liu, J-W Kim, P J Ryan, and J-H Chu

    J J. Sanchez, P Malinowski, J Mutch, J Liu, J-W Kim, P J Ryan, and J-H Chu. The transport–structural correspondence across the nematic phase transition probed by elasto X-ray diffraction.Nat. Mater., 20(11):1519–1524, 2021

    2021

  25. [25]

    Giant lattice softening at a Lifshitz transition in Sr2RuO4.Science, 382(6669):447–450, 2023

    H M L Noad, K Ishida, Y-S Li, E Gati, V Stangier, N Kikugawa, D A Sokolov, M Nicklas, B Kim, I I Mazin, M Garst, J Schmalian, A P Mackenzie, and C W Hicks. Giant lattice softening at a Lifshitz transition in Sr2RuO4.Science, 382(6669):447–450, 2023

    2023

  26. [26]

    Probing Quantum Materials with Uniaxial Stress.Annual Reviews of Condensed Matter Physics, 16:417, 2025

    C W Hicks, F Jerzembeck, H M L Noad, M E Barber, and A P Mackenzie. Probing Quantum Materials with Uniaxial Stress.Annual Reviews of Condensed Matter Physics, 16:417, 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    Single crystal growth of the metallic triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO 2 .J

    H Takatsu and Y Maeno. Single crystal growth of the metallic triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO 2 .J. Cryst. Growth, 312(23):3461–3465, 2010

    2010

  28. [28]

    Flux growth in a horizontal configuration: An analog to vapor transport growth.Phys

    J-Q Yan, B C Sales, M A Susner, and M A McGuire. Flux growth in a horizontal configuration: An analog to vapor transport growth.Phys. Rev. Mater., 1:023402, 2017

    2017

  29. [29]

    Mackenzie, S Nakatsuji, and C W Hicks

    M Ikhlas, K R Shirer, P-Y Yang, A P. Mackenzie, S Nakatsuji, and C W Hicks. A tunable stress dilatometer and measurement of the thermal expansion under uniaxial stress of Mn 3Sn.Appl. Phys. Lett., 117(23):233502, 2020

    2020

  30. [30]

    Piezoelectric-based apparatus for strain tuning.Rev

    C W Hicks, M E Barber, S D Edkins, D O Brodsky, and A P Mackenzie. Piezoelectric-based apparatus for strain tuning.Rev. Sci. Instrum., 85(6):065003, 2014

    2014

  31. [31]

    Application of signal separation to diffraction image compression and serial crystallography.J

    J Kieffer, J Orlans, N Coquelle, S Debionne, S Basu, A Homs, G Santoni, and D De Sanctis. Application of signal separation to diffraction image compression and serial crystallography.J. Appl. Crystallogr., 58(1):138– 153, 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    PhD thesis, Technische Universitaet Dresden, 2025

    N Stilkerich.Uniaxial pressure-driven magnetic phase transitions in the frustrated antiferromagnet PdCrO 2. PhD thesis, Technische Universitaet Dresden, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Piezoelectric-based uniaxial pressure cell with integrated force and displacement sensors.Rev

    M E Barber, A Steppke, A P Mackenzie, and C W Hicks. Piezoelectric-based uniaxial pressure cell with integrated force and displacement sensors.Rev. Sci. Instrum., 90:023904, 2019

    2019

  34. [34]

    Wish: The new powder and single crystal magnetic diffractometer on the second target station

    L C Chapon, P Manuel, P G Radaelli, C Benson, L Perrott, S Ansell, N J Rhodes, D Raspino, D Duxbury, E Spill, and J Norris. Wish: The new powder and single crystal magnetic diffractometer on the second target station. Neutron News, 22(2):22–25, 2011

    2011

  35. [35]

    Elastic tensor of Sr2RuO4.Phys

    J Paglione, C Lupien, W A MacFarlane, J M Perz, L Taillefer, Z Q Mao, and Y Maeno. Elastic tensor of Sr2RuO4.Phys. Rev. B, 65:220506, 2002. Uniaxial-stress-induced magnetic transitions in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO 2 13

    2002

  36. [36]

    doi: 10.5286/SOFT- WARE/MANTID6.8

    Mantid 6.8.0: Manipulation and Analysis Toolkit for In- strument Data.; Mantid Project. doi: 10.5286/SOFT- WARE/MANTID6.8

    work page doi:10.5286/soft-

  37. [37]

    Arnold, J

    O. Arnold, J. C. Bilheux, J. M. Borreguero, A. Buts, S. I. Campbell, L. Chapon, M. Doucet, N. Draper, R. Fer- raz Leal, M. A. Gigg, V. E. Lunch, A. Markvardsen, D. J. Mikkelson, R. L. Mikkelson, R. Miller, K. Palmen, P. Parker, G. Passos, T. G. Perring, P. F. Peterson, and J. Zikovsky. Mantid—Data analysis and visualization package for neutron scattering ...

    2014

  38. [38]

    Magnetic frustration and spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking in PdCrO 2.Phys

    D Sun, D A Sokolov, J M Bartlett, J Sannigrahi, S Khim, P Kushwaha, D D Khalyavin, P Manuel, A S Gibbs, H Takagi, A P Mackenzie, and C W Hicks. Magnetic frustration and spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking in PdCrO 2.Phys. Rev. B, 100:094414, 2019

    2019

  39. [39]

    Quantum Oscillations and High Carrier Mobility in the Delafossite PdCoO2.Phys

    C W Hicks, A S Gibbs, A P Mackenzie, H Takatsu, Y Maeno, and E A Yelland. Quantum Oscillations and High Carrier Mobility in the Delafossite PdCoO2.Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:116401, 2012

    2012

  40. [40]

    Min, and H-D Kim

    H-J Noh, J-W Jeong, J-H Jeong, E-J Cho, S B Kim, K Kim, B I. Min, and H-D Kim. Anisotropic Electric Conductivity of Delafossite PdCoO 2 Studied by Angle- Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:256404, 2009

    2009

  41. [41]

    The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 underc-axis uniaxial stress.Nature Commun., 13:4596, 2022

    F Jerzembeck, H S Røising, A Steppke, H Rosner, D A Sokolov, N Kikugawa, T Scaffidi, S H Simon, A P Mackenzie, and C W Hicks. The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 underc-axis uniaxial stress.Nature Commun., 13:4596, 2022

    2022

  42. [42]

    M. E. Barber, H.-H. Kim, T. Loew, M. Le Tacon, M. Minola, M. Konczykowski, B. Keimer, A. P. Mackenzie, and C. W. Hicks. Dependence ofT c of YBa2Cu3O6.67 on in-plane uniaxial stress.Phys. Rev. B, 106:184516, 2022

    2022

  43. [43]

    J. Cao, E. Ertekin, V. Srinivasan, W. Fan, S. Huang, H. Zheng, J. W. L. Yim, D. R. Khanal, D. F. Ogletree, J. C. Grossman, and J. Wu. Strain engineering and one-dimensional organization of metal–insulator domains in single-crystal vanadium dioxide beams.Nature Nanotech., 4:732, 2009

    2009

  44. [44]

    120633327/

    Data Availability The neutron scattering data are available at https://data.isis.stfc.ac.uk/doi/STUDY/... 120633327/. The XRD and stress-strain data are available at https://doi.org/10.25500/edata.bham.00001577

    work page doi:10.25500/edata.bham.00001577

  45. [45]

    Appendix 9.1. Conversion from sensor units to force and displacement To convert the raw force and displacement sensor capacitances to force and displacement, we apply the following relations [25]: F= ϵ0kfAf ( 1 Cf−Cf,offset − 1 Cf,0−Cf,offset ) −kflexD, D=ϵ0Ad ( 1 Cd−Cd,offset − 1 Cd,0−Cd,offset ) . kf is the spring constant of the force sensor flexures, ...

  46. [46]

    magnetic reflection was found to move under uniaxial stress at rate dh/dσ=−0.047±0.009 GPa−1, over a range of stress extending from zero to the double-single-qtransition. In the small-σregime, and assuming thatJdepends on interatomic separation only,dh/dσis given in the above magnetic model by dh dσ= (1 +ν) √ 3 8π 1 E a0 J0 dJ da,(10) whereνis the Poisson...