Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 51 references

Class I CH3OH masers mark shocks from bar-driven inflow colliding with the CMZ

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 16:05 UTC pith:CBBPVMUF

load-bearing objection New Class I maser detections at l=1.3 are solid but the bar-inflow collision link stays suggestive without tests against other CMZ dynamics. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.09425 v1 pith:CBBPVMUF submitted 2026-06-08 astro-ph.GA

Class I CH3OH Maser Emission from Bar-Driven Inflow Colliding with the Central Molecular Zone

V. S. Veena , W.-J. Kim , P. Schilke , A. Sanchez-Monge , C. Henkel , S. Viti , G. Esplugues , F. Wyrowski
show 4 more authors
W. E. Banda-Barragan M. C. Sormani D. Riquelme G. A. Fuller
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Class I methanol masersCentral Molecular Zonebar-driven inflowsshock chemistryGalactic centerSiO emissiongas dynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports detection of widespread 36.2 GHz Class I methanol maser emission across several parsecs at Galactic longitude l=1.3, where bar-driven gas inflow along the near-side dust lane is proposed to interact with the Central Molecular Zone. The masers coincide spatially and kinematically with enhanced SiO and thermal CH3OH emission plus an extended velocity feature at VLSR ~100 km/s seen in CO data. The authors conclude that the masers arise mainly from shock-processed gas created by this large-scale dynamical interaction, while allowing that local star-formation shocks may contribute to a subset. The site is presented as a Galactic analogue to maser environments in the nuclei of external barred galaxies. A sympathetic reader cares because the result connects galactic-scale gas flows directly to the conditions that excite one of the most common maser species.

Core claim

The observed masers are primarily associated with shock-processed gas in a kinematically complex bar-CMZ interface region. Large-scale gas interactions are likely to play an important role in producing the maser emission, although a subset of the masers may also be linked to shocks driven by local star-formation activity. Thermal CH3OH and SiO emission extend over the mapped 24 pc area with enhanced fractional abundances, and the brightest detected maser has an isotropic luminosity of 0.9 x 10^-3 L_Sun.

What carries the argument

The 36.2 GHz Class I CH3OH maser emission and its spatial-kinematic coincidence with enhanced SiO and thermal CH3OH at the bar-CMZ interface velocity feature near 100 km/s

Load-bearing premise

The velocity feature at VLSR ~100 km/s and the enhanced SiO and thermal CH3OH emission are produced by the bar-driven inflow colliding with the CMZ boundary rather than other dynamical processes.

What would settle it

Higher-resolution maps showing that the maser positions do not overlap with the peaks of SiO emission or the 100 km/s CO velocity component would undermine the link to the bar-CMZ collision.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Large-scale gas interactions can trigger widespread Class I CH3OH maser emission in the CMZ.
  • The bar-CMZ interface produces shock conditions that excite both masers and enhanced SiO/CH3OH abundances over parsec scales.
  • This region functions as a local template for shock-dominated Class I maser activity in the nuclear regions of barred galaxies.
  • A subset of the masers may still arise from shocks driven by ongoing local star formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar maser searches could locate inflow-CMZ collision sites in external barred galaxies.
  • The 100 km/s velocity feature offers a potential kinematic tracer for gas overshooting the Galactic plane in the Milky Way center.
  • Such bar-driven interfaces may regulate CMZ star-formation efficiency by processing infalling material through repeated shocks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports detections of widespread 36.2 GHz Class I CH3OH masers (plus two 44.1 GHz candidates) in the l=1.3° bar-CMZ interface region using Yebes 40m observations, complemented by Herschel-HiGAL and CHIMPS2 archival data. The masers are spatially and kinematically associated with enhanced SiO and thermal CH3OH emission over ~24 pc and with an extended CO velocity feature at V_LSR ~100 km/s; the authors conclude that the masers primarily trace shock-processed gas driven by bar-driven inflow colliding with the CMZ, though a subset may arise from local star-formation shocks. The region is presented as a Galactic analogue for shock-dominated Class I maser environments in extragalactic barred nuclei.

Significance. If the kinematic and chemical associations hold, the result strengthens the case that large-scale bar-driven flows can regulate shock chemistry and maser activity at the CMZ boundary, offering a resolved template for interpreting unresolved nuclear maser emission in external galaxies. The reported isotropic luminosity of the brightest maser (0.9×10^{-3} L_⊙) also places it among the most luminous Galactic Class I sources, adding to the census of extreme maser sites.

major comments (1)
  1. [CO position-velocity analysis] CO position-velocity analysis: the central claim that the masers trace bar-driven inflow colliding with the CMZ rests on spatial/velocity coincidence with the V_LSR ~100 km/s feature and enhanced SiO/CH3OH. The manuscript does not include quantitative discrimination (e.g., orbit modeling, comparison to x1/x2 intersections, or tests against local cloud-collision or projection scenarios) to show this feature cannot arise from other CMZ dynamics, leaving the causal attribution as one plausible interpretation among several.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract provides no information on data reduction, calibration, or error bars for the Yebes observations; these details should be summarized even if expanded in the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and recommendation. We address the single major comment below, agreeing that the dynamical interpretation would benefit from additional discussion of alternatives.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: CO position-velocity analysis: the central claim that the masers trace bar-driven inflow colliding with the CMZ rests on spatial/velocity coincidence with the V_LSR ~100 km/s feature and enhanced SiO/CH3OH. The manuscript does not include quantitative discrimination (e.g., orbit modeling, comparison to x1/x2 intersections, or tests against local cloud-collision or projection scenarios) to show this feature cannot arise from other CMZ dynamics, leaving the causal attribution as one plausible interpretation among several.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the interpretation relies primarily on the observed spatial and kinematic coincidence with the extended V_LSR ~100 km/s CO feature, together with the enhanced SiO and thermal CH3OH emission as shock tracers. The position-velocity diagrams presented in the manuscript identify this association but do not include orbit modeling, explicit x1/x2 orbit comparisons, or quantitative tests ruling out local cloud collisions or projection effects. Such analyses would require dedicated dynamical simulations or higher-resolution kinematic data that exceed the scope of this observational study. We therefore agree that the bar-driven inflow scenario remains one plausible interpretation, albeit one reinforced by the multi-tracer chemical evidence of widespread shock processing. In revision we will add a paragraph to the discussion section that explicitly considers alternative dynamical origins for the velocity feature and will qualify the language on the role of large-scale inflows to reflect this evidential basis. This constitutes a partial revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain or fitted parameters; purely observational associations

full rationale

The paper reports new telescope observations of maser lines plus archival survey data, then notes spatial/kinematic coincidences with SiO, thermal CH3OH, and a CO velocity feature. No equations, parameter fits, or model derivations appear; conclusions rest on direct data associations rather than any reduction to prior results by construction. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any claimed prediction. This matches the default non-circular case for observational work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper uses standard assumptions from radio astronomy and astrochemistry; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced based on the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Class I methanol masers trace shocks in molecular gas
    Standard interpretation in astrochemistry used to link detections to shocks.
  • domain assumption Spatial and velocity coincidence indicates physical association
    Common assumption in observational astronomy for associating emission features.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5976 in / 1443 out tokens · 30104 ms · 2026-06-27T16:05:15.152545+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Central Molecular Zone of the Milky Way is shaped by the interplay of bar-driven inflows, shocks, and star formation. At Galactic longitude l=1.3, gas inflowing along the near-side dust lane has been proposed to interact with the CMZ boundary and overshoot above the Galactic plane, making this a key site to investigate how large-scale gas dynamics regulates star formation. We aim to investigate the presence of Class I methanol maser emission in this transitional region, testing whether large-scale gas interactions in the CMZ can trigger widespread maser activity via star formation or shocks. We conducted a dedicated search for the 36.2 and 44.1 GHz Class I CH3OH maser lines, along with the 48.4 GHz thermal transition, using the Yebes 40m telescope. We complemented these data with archival data from the Herschel-HiGAL survey and the CHIMPS2 survey to explore links between masers, shocks, and star formation. We detect widespread 36.2 GHz maser emission and two candidate 44.1 GHz masers in a region extending several parsecs. The brightest maser has an isotropic luminosity 0.9x10^-3 L_Sun, placing it among the most luminous Galactic Class I masers. Thermal CH3OH and SiO emission extend over mapped area of 24 pc, with both species showing enhanced fractional abundances. CO position-velocity analysis further shows that the masers are associated with an extended velocity feature at VLSR~100 km/s. We conclude that the observed masers are primarily associated with shock-processed gas in a kinematically complex bar-CMZ interface region. Large-scale gas interactions are likely to play an important role in producing the maser emission, although a subset of the masers may also be linked to shocks driven by local star-formation activity. This region therefore provides a promising Galactic analogue of shock-dominated Class I CH3OH maser environments observed in nuclear regions of barred galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09425 by A. Sanchez-Monge, C. Henkel, D. Riquelme, F. Wyrowski, G. A. Fuller, G. Esplugues, M. C. Sormani, P. Schilke, S. Viti, V. S. Veena, W. E. Banda-Barragan, W.-J. Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Integrated intensity map of 12CO (3–2) in the Local Standard of Rest (LSR) velocity range 100 to 200 km s−1 from the CHIMPS2 survey (Eden et al. 2020). Locations of the Helix stream and the G1.3 cloud are indicated with arrows. Positions of Sgr A* and peak of Sgr B cloud complex are also marked with open circles. The blue square outlines the region covered in the present work. The dashed line AB shows the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Channel maps of CH3OH emission at 36.2 GHz. Each panel shows the spatial distribution of emission at a velocity interval of 10 km s−1 , spanning 65 to 155 km s−1 . Contour levels are 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, 12.8 and 25.6 K. The beam size is shown towards the bottom right of each panel. 6  ! [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Channel maps of CH3OH emission at 44.1 GHz. Each panel shows the spatial distribution of emission at a velocity interval of 10 km s−1 , spanning 65 to 155 km s−1 . Contour levels are 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 K. The beam size is shown towards the bottom right of each panel. 2. Observations and archival data 2.1. CH3OH and SiO observations To investigate the presence of potential Class I methanol masers, we carried… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Channel maps of CH3OH emission at 48.4 GHz. Each panel shows the spatial distribution of emission at a velocity interval of 10 km s−1 , spanning 85 to 125 km s−1 . Contour levels are from 1.0 K to 5.0 K, in steps of 1 K. The beam size is shown towards the bottom right of each panel. CHIMPS2 is a large-scale CO survey of the Galaxy, covering the inner Galaxy, the CMZ, and part of the outer Galaxy, carried o… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Beam-averaged spectra of 36.2 GHz 4−1 − 30E (top panel), 44.1 GHz 70 − 61A + (middle panel), and 48.4 GHz 10 − 00A + (bottom panel) CH3OH transitions toward positions that satisfy the maser candidate criteria (see Sect. 3.1 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Continued.) greater number of Gaussian components. However, after apply￾ing the same spatial filtering procedure and grouping multiple velocity components associated with the same maser position, the number of unique maser candidates remained effectively un￾changed. This confirms that the 0.8 km s−1 resolution preserves all relevant physical structure while avoiding overfitting and en￾suring more stable c… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Histogram of velocity offset distribution with respect to the LSR velocity of 105 km s−1 for 23 maser components. where d is the distance to the source (assumed to be 8.2 kpc; GRAVITY Collaboration et al. 2019), and R S 36.2dV is the inte￾grated flux density in units of Jy km s−1 . The numerical coeffi￾cient 3.77 × 10−8 incorporates the conversion from Jy km s−1 to luminosity units using the rest frequency… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Left) Integrated intensity emission at 36.2 GHz fro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Colour composite showing 36.2 GHz maser-dominated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Pixel-by-pixel comparison between CH3OH and SiO fractional abundances (for Tex = 20 K), both plotted in log–log space. The red dashed line indicates the best-fit power-law re￾lation. A positive correlation is present (Spearman ρS = 0.68, p ≪ 0.001), suggesting that the relationship between the two species is not solely driven by variations in total H2 column den￾sity. Points are color-coded by N(H2) to ill… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (Left) 12CO(3–2) PV diagram from the CHIMPS2 survey. The rectangle marks the region investigated in the present study. (Right) PPV visualisation of the rectangular region highlighted in the left panel, with the positions of Class I methanol masers overlaid as black crosses. intensity map, we identify several emission features. There are elongated filamentary emission features identified toward the SgrB re… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of 36.2 and 44.1 GHz fluxes for Class I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references

  1. [1]

    2011, ApJS, 196, 21 Article number, page 12 of 16 V

    Bae, J.-H., Kim, K.-T., Y oun, S.-Y ., et al. 2011, ApJS, 196, 21 Article number, page 12 of 16 V . S. V eena et al.: Class I CH3OH Maser Emission from Bar-Driven Inflow Colliding with the C entral Molecular Zone

    2011

  2. [2]

    K., Whitworth, A

    Balfour, S. K., Whitworth, A. P ., Hubber, D. A., & Ja ffa, S. E. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 2471

    2015

  3. [3]

    E., Stark, A

    Binney, J., Gerhard, O. E., Stark, A. A., Bally, J., & Uchida, K. I. 1991, MNRAS, 252, 210

    1991

  4. [4]

    A., Riquelme, D., Güsten, R., et al

    Busch, L. A., Riquelme, D., Güsten, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A183 Butterfield, N. O., Lang, C. C., Ginsburg, A., et al. 2022, ApJ , 936, 186

    2022

  5. [5]

    L., Fuller, G

    Caswell, J. L., Fuller, G. A., Green, J. A., et al. 2010, MNRAS , 404, 1029

    2010

  6. [6]

    2026, ApJ, 999, L20

    Chen, X., Y ang, T., Song, S., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, L20

    2026

  7. [7]

    Cotton, W. D. & Y usef-Zadeh, F. 2016, ApJS, 227, 10

    2016

  8. [8]

    J., Brogan, C

    Cyganowski, C. J., Brogan, C. L., Hunter, T. R., et al. 2012, A pJ, 760, L20

    2012

  9. [9]

    J., Moore, T

    Eden, D. J., Moore, T. J. T., Currie, M. J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 5936

    2020

  10. [10]

    2021, MNRAS, 504, 2742

    Elia, D., Merello, M., Molinari, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 2742

    2021

  11. [11]

    2017, MNRAS, 471 , 100

    Elia, D., Molinari, S., Schisano, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471 , 100

    2017

  12. [12]

    P ., Chen, X., Breen, S

    Ellingsen, S. P ., Chen, X., Breen, S. L., & Qiao, H. H. 2017, MN RAS, 472, 604

    2017

  13. [13]

    P ., Chen, X., Qiao, H.-H., et al

    Ellingsen, S. P ., Chen, X., Qiao, H.-H., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790 , L28

    2014

  14. [14]

    B., Cazaux, S., Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., & Ca selli, P

    Esplugues, G. B., Cazaux, S., Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., & Ca selli, P . 2016, A&A, 591, A52

    2016

  15. [15]

    Fontani, F., Cesaroni, R., & Furuya, R. S. 2010, A&A, 517, A56

    2010

  16. [16]

    H., Caselli, P ., & Herbst, E

    Garrod, R., Park, I. H., Caselli, P ., & Herbst, E. 2006, Faraday Discussions, 133, 51

    2006

  17. [17]

    M., Salim, S., Hornstein, S

    Ghez, A. M., Salim, S., Hornstein, S. D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 620 , 744

    2005

  18. [18]

    2018, ApJ, 853, 17 1

    Ginsburg, A., Bally, J., Barnes, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 17 1

    2018

  19. [19]

    2016, A&A, 586, A50 GRA VITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al

    Ginsburg, A., Henkel, C., Ao, Y ., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A50 GRA VITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, L10

    2016

  20. [20]

    2019, ApJ, 884, 1 00 Hatchfield, H

    Harada, N., Sakamoto, K., Martín, S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 1 00 Hatchfield, H. P ., Sormani, M. C., Tress, R. G., et al. 2021, Ap J, 922, 79

    2019

  21. [21]

    D., Barnes, A

    Henshaw, J. D., Barnes, A. T., Battersby, C., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Pl anets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 83

    2023

  22. [22]

    , & Priestley, F

    Holdship, J., Viti, S., Jiménez-Serra, I., Makrymallis, A. , & Priestley, F. 2017, AJ, 154, 38

    2017

  23. [23]

    K., Henkel, C., Gong, Y ., et al

    Humire, P . K., Henkel, C., Gong, Y ., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A106

    2020

  24. [24]

    K., Henkel, C., Hernández-Gómez, A., et al

    Humire, P . K., Henkel, C., Hernández-Gómez, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A33

    2022

  25. [25]

    A., Burton, M

    Jones, P . A., Burton, M. G., Tothill, N. F. H., & Cunningham, M . R. 2011, MN- RAS, 411, 2293

    2011

  26. [26]

    2019, ApJS, 244, 2

    Kim, W.-J., Kim, K.-T., & Kim, K.-T. 2019, ApJS, 244, 2

    2019

  27. [27]

    S., V eena, V

    Kim, W.-J., Urquhart, J. S., V eena, V . S., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A123

    2023

  28. [28]

    Kurtz, S., Hofner, P ., & Álvarez, C. V . 2004, ApJS, 155, 149

    2004

  29. [29]

    M., & Walmsley, C

    Leurini, S., Menten, K. M., & Walmsley, C. M. 2016, A&A, 592, A 31

    2016

  30. [30]

    R., V era-Ciro, C., Murray, C

    Lindner, R. R., V era-Ciro, C., Murray, C. E., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 138

    2015

  31. [31]

    A., Whitworth, A

    Marsh, K. A., Whitworth, A. P ., Lomax, O., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 2730

    2017

  32. [32]

    P ., Ellingsen, S

    McCarthy, T. P ., Ellingsen, S. P ., Breen, S. L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4578 Mège, P ., Russeil, D., Zavagno, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A74

    2018

  33. [33]

    Mehringer, D. M. & Menten, K. M. 1997, ApJ, 474, 346

    1997

  34. [34]

    2022, A&A, 666, A31

    Meng, F., Sánchez-Monge, Á., Schilke, P ., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A31

    2022

  35. [35]

    Menten, K. M. 1991, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Con ference Series, V ol. 16, Atoms, Ions and Molecules: New Results in Spectral L ine Astro- physics, ed. A. D. Haschick & P . T. P . Ho, 119–136

    1991

  36. [36]

    M., Wilson, R

    Menten, K. M., Wilson, R. W., Leurini, S., & Schilke, P . 2009, ApJ, 692, 47

    2009

  37. [37]

    E., & Booth, R

    Minier, V ., Conway, J. E., & Booth, R. S. 2001, A&A, 369, 278

    2001

  38. [38]

    1993, ApJ, 408, 496

    Morris, M. 1993, ApJ, 408, 496

    1993

  39. [39]

    & Serabyn, E

    Morris, M. & Serabyn, E. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 645 Müller, H. S. P ., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G . 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215 Ortiz-León, G. N., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2021 , A&A, 651, A87

    1996

  40. [40]

    2005, in SF2A-2005: Semaine de l’Astrophysique Fra ncaise, ed

    Pety, J. 2005, in SF2A-2005: Semaine de l’Astrophysique Fra ncaise, ed. F. Ca- soli, T. Contini, J. M. Hameury, & L. Pagani, 721 Pihlström, Y . M., Sjouwerman, L. O., Frail, D. A., et al. 2014 , AJ, 147, 73

    2005

  41. [41]

    Plambeck, R. L. & Menten, K. M. 1990, ApJ, 364, 555

    1990

  42. [42]

    A., Keane, T

    Pratap, P ., Shute, P . A., Keane, T. C., Battersby, C., & Sterling, S. 2008, AJ, 135, 1718

    2008

  43. [43]

    D., et al

    Riener, M., Kainulainen, J., Henshaw, J. D., et al. 2019, A&A , 628, A78 Sánchez-Monge, Á., Schilke, P ., Schmiedeke, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A6

    2019

  44. [44]

    M., Pineau des Forets, G., & Flower, D

    Schilke, P ., Walmsley, C. M., Pineau des Forets, G., & Flower, D. R. 1997, A&A, 321, 293

    1997

  45. [45]

    2016, A&A, 588, A143 Schwörer, A., Sánchez-Monge, Á., Schilke, P ., et al

    Schmiedeke, A., Schilke, P ., Möller, T., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A143 Schwörer, A., Sánchez-Monge, Á., Schilke, P ., et al. 2019, A &A, 628, A6

    2016

  46. [46]

    Sobolev, A. M. 1992, Soviet Ast., 36, 590

    1992

  47. [47]

    C., Treß, R

    Sormani, M. C., Treß, R. G., Glover, S. C. O., et al. 2019, MNRA S, 488, 4663

    2019

  48. [48]

    A., Gallego, J

    Tercero, F., López-Pérez, J. A., Gallego, J. D., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A37

    2021

  49. [49]

    H., Lacy, J

    Townes, C. H., Lacy, J. H., Geballe, T. R., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1983, Nature, 301, 661 V eena, V . S., Kim, W. J., Sánchez-Monge, Á., et al. 2024, A&A,689, A121 V oronkov, M. A., Caswell, J. L., Ellingsen, S. P ., Green, J. A ., & Breen, S. L. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2584

    1983

  50. [50]

    C., Christie, D., & Nakamura, F

    Wu, B., Tan, J. C., Christie, D., & Nakamura, F. 2020, ApJ, 891 , 168 Y ang, W., Gong, Y ., Menten, K. M., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A112 Y usef-Zadeh, F., Cotton, W., Viti, S., Wardle, M., & Royster, M. 2013, ApJ, 764, L19

    2020

  51. [51]

    2020, MNRAS, 4 97, 4896 Article number, page 13 of 16 A&A proofs: manuscript no

    Zeng, S., Zhang, Q., Jiménez-Serra, I., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 4 97, 4896 Article number, page 13 of 16 A&A proofs: manuscript no. manuscript Appendix A: Additional figures and tables 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 36.2 GHz (4 −1 −3 0 E) −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Fl x Density (Jy) 44.1 GHz (7 0 −6 1 A + ) 60 80 100 120 140 160 Velocity (km s −1 ) 0 2 4 6 48.4 GHz (1 0 −0 0 A + )...

    2020