Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 1 minor 58 references

JWST observations of the Pillars of Creation reveal 253 YSO candidates with overdensities along feedback structure boundaries and a tentative age-distance trend suggesting triggered star formation in a subset.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-29 05:25 UTC pith:YYMBCDTH

load-bearing objection New JWST counts and images of YSOs in the Pillars are the useful part, but the triggered-formation suggestion stays untested against projection or selection effects. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2605.29904 v2 pith:YYMBCDTH submitted 2026-05-28 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Evidence of triggered star formation in the Pillars of Creation from JWST observations

Jing Wen , Bingqiu Chen , Jian Gao , Jun Li , Ming Yang , Biwei Jiang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA
keywords triggered star formationPillars of CreationJWSTyoung stellar objectsEagle Nebulastellar feedbackNGC 6611
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports high-resolution JWST imaging that identifies 253 young stellar object candidates in the Pillars of Creation. These candidates show spatial overdensities along the edges of structures shaped by radiation and winds from the nearby NGC 6611 cluster, plus a weak trend toward younger ages at greater distances from the ionizing source. An apparent uptick in the star formation rate within the last million years is also noted. The authors interpret the combined spatial and age patterns as evidence that most YSOs formed at the same time as the central cluster while a subset may have been triggered by the feedback.

Core claim

The central claim is that the observed spatial correlations of YSO candidates with pillar boundaries, combined with the tentative decrease in stellar age with distance from the ionizing source and the recent enhancement in star formation rate, indicate that a subset of the young stars formed through triggering by the feedback from NGC 6611, even though the bulk formed contemporaneously with the central cluster.

What carries the argument

Spatial overdensities of YSO candidates along the boundaries of feedback-driven pillar structures, together with their tentative age gradient relative to the ionizing source.

Load-bearing premise

The spatial overdensities along pillar boundaries and the age-distance trend result from feedback triggering rather than projection effects, incomplete classification, or unrelated dynamics.

What would settle it

A statistical test that removes the apparent overdensities and age trend after accounting for line-of-sight projection or after applying stricter YSO selection criteria would falsify the triggering interpretation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The bulk of the YSOs formed at roughly the same time as the central NGC 6611 cluster.
  • An enhancement in the star formation rate occurred within the past 1 Myr in this region.
  • JWST imaging additionally reveals fine structures such as a spiral-like disk and bi-reflection nebulae at the tips of the pillars.
  • The patterns are consistent with ionizing radiation and stellar winds from massive stars influencing nearby star formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar age and spatial analyses in other feedback-dominated regions could test whether the fraction of triggered stars scales with pillar geometry or radiation intensity.
  • If the tentative age trend holds in deeper surveys, it would constrain the timescale over which feedback can induce new star formation.
  • Follow-up spectroscopy of the YSO candidates could distinguish true triggering from chance alignments by measuring their velocities relative to the pillars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents JWST NIRCam and MIRI observations of the Pillars of Creation, identifying 253 YSO candidates. It reports spatial overdensities of these candidates along the boundaries of the feedback-sculpted pillars and a tentative trend of decreasing stellar age with increasing distance from the ionizing source NGC 6611, together with an apparent enhancement in the star-formation rate within the past 1 Myr. These associations are interpreted as evidence that, while most YSOs formed contemporaneously with the central cluster, a subset may have formed via triggering by stellar feedback.

Significance. If the YSO classification, age estimates, and statistical tests can be shown to be robust, the result would supply spatially resolved, multi-wavelength evidence for triggered star formation in a well-studied feedback-dominated region. The high-resolution JWST data on an iconic object constitute a clear observational strength; however, the absence of methodological detail currently prevents any assessment of whether the claimed correlations exceed those expected from projection, selection biases, or dynamical mixing.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that spatial overdensities and a tentative age-distance trend indicate triggered star formation rests on the untested assumption that these patterns are inconsistent with line-of-sight projection or classification artifacts; no Monte Carlo realizations, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests against randomized positions, or completeness simulations are described.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the selection criteria, contamination estimates, and completeness corrections for the 253 YSO candidates are not stated, rendering it impossible to evaluate whether the reported overdensities along pillar boundaries are statistically significant or affected by observational bias.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the method used to derive stellar ages, the quantitative definition of the 'weak trend,' and any associated uncertainty or significance test are omitted, so the claimed age-distance relation cannot be assessed for robustness.
  4. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported enhancement in star-formation rate within the past 1 Myr is asserted without reference to the underlying age distribution, binning choices, or any statistical comparison to a null model.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'bi-reflection nebulae' without defining the term or providing a figure reference; a brief clarification would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

4 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments correctly identify that key methodological details supporting the statistical robustness of our claims are currently omitted from the manuscript. We will revise to address each point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that spatial overdensities and a tentative age-distance trend indicate triggered star formation rests on the untested assumption that these patterns are inconsistent with line-of-sight projection or classification artifacts; no Monte Carlo realizations, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests against randomized positions, or completeness simulations are described.

    Authors: We agree that the significance of the spatial correlations and age-distance trend must be tested against projection and selection effects. In the revised manuscript we will add Monte Carlo realizations of randomized YSO positions drawn from the observed spatial distribution, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests comparing the observed age-distance relation to randomized samples, and completeness simulations based on the JWST detection limits. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the selection criteria, contamination estimates, and completeness corrections for the 253 YSO candidates are not stated, rendering it impossible to evaluate whether the reported overdensities along pillar boundaries are statistically significant or affected by observational bias.

    Authors: The manuscript will be expanded with a dedicated Methods subsection that fully specifies the NIRCam/MIRI color-color and magnitude criteria used to select the 253 YSO candidates, the estimated contamination fraction from background galaxies and field stars, and the completeness corrections derived from artificial-source injection tests. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the method used to derive stellar ages, the quantitative definition of the 'weak trend,' and any associated uncertainty or significance test are omitted, so the claimed age-distance relation cannot be assessed for robustness.

    Authors: We will describe the age estimation procedure (SED fitting to pre-main-sequence tracks), give the quantitative definition of the trend (e.g., Spearman rank correlation coefficient with uncertainty), report the formal uncertainties on individual ages, and include a statistical significance test of the age-distance relation. revision: yes

  4. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported enhancement in star-formation rate within the past 1 Myr is asserted without reference to the underlying age distribution, binning choices, or any statistical comparison to a null model.

    Authors: The revised text will present the binned age distribution of the YSO sample, specify the adopted time bins, and include a statistical comparison (e.g., Poisson likelihood ratio or Monte Carlo test) of the observed recent SFR against a constant-SFR null hypothesis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely observational paper with no equations, fits, or self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper reports JWST observations of 253 YSO candidates, notes spatial overdensities along pillar boundaries, a tentative age-distance trend, and an apparent recent SFR enhancement, then offers an interpretive suggestion that a subset may relate to triggered star formation. No equations, parameter fits, model derivations, or self-citations appear in the provided text. The central claim is an inference from raw counts and positions rather than a reduction of any quantity to itself by construction. This matches the default case of a self-contained observational report with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such elements remain unknown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5759 in / 1106 out tokens · 19835 ms · 2026-06-29T05:25:25.645831+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Stars form in molecular clouds under the influence of their local environments, yet the role of massive stellar feedback in either triggering or suppressing star formation remains a fundamental question in astrophysics. The Pillars of Creation in the Eagle Nebula, sculpted by ionizing radiation and stellar winds from massive stars in NGC 6611, offer a natural laboratory for investigating this question. Here we present high-resolution observations of the Pillars of Creation using the JWST Near Infrared Camera and Mid-Infrared Instrument, revealing 253 young stellar object (YSO) candidates. These YSO candidates show spatial correlations with the edges of feedback-driven structures, with overdensities along the boundaries. A weak trend of decreasing stellar age with increasing distance from the ionizing source was tentatively observed. There also appears to be an enhancement in the star formation rate within the past 1 Myr in this region. Such age and spatial associations suggest that while the bulk of the YSOs may have formed contemporaneously with the central cluster, a subset could be associated with triggered star formation. The JWST image of intricate structures, including a spiral-like disk and bi-reflection nebulae at the tips of Pillar I and Pillar II, further highlights the complexity of star formation processes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Luisi, M.et al.Stellar feedback and triggered star formation in the prototypical bubble RCW 120.Science Advances7, eabe9511 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    E., Ercolano, B

    Dale, J. E., Ercolano, B. & Bonnell, I. A. Ionization-induced star formation - IV. Triggering in bound clusters.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.427, 2852–2865 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Oliveira, J. M. inHandbook of Star Forming Regions Vol. II(ed. Reipurth, B.) 599–624 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    J.et al.Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 Imaging of M16: Pho- toevaporation and Emerging Young Stellar Objects.Astron

    Hester, J. J.et al.Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 Imaging of M16: Pho- toevaporation and Emerging Young Stellar Objects.Astron. J.111, 2349 (1996)

    1996

  5. [5]

    McCaughrean, M. J. & Andersen, M. The Eagle’s EGGs: Fertile or sterile? Astron. Astrophys.389, 513–518 (2002)

    2002

  6. [6]

    I., Smith, B

    Thompson, R. I., Smith, B. A. & Hester, J. J. Embedded Star Formation in the Eagle Nebula.Astrophys. J.570, 749–757 (2002)

    2002

  7. [7]

    J.666, 321–338 (2007)

    Indebetouw, R.et al.Embedded Star Formation in the Eagle Nebula with Spitzer GLIMPSE.Astrophys. J.666, 321–338 (2007). 19

    2007

  8. [8]

    L., Gagn´ e, M., Mytyk, A., McCaughrean, M

    Linsky, J. L., Gagn´ e, M., Mytyk, A., McCaughrean, M. & Andersen, M. Chandra Observations of the Eagle Nebula. I. Embedded Young Stellar Objects near the Pillars of Creation.Astrophys. J.654, 347–360 (2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    S.et al.Identifying Young Stars in Massive Star-forming Regions for the MYStIX Project.Astrophys

    Broos, P. S.et al.Identifying Young Stars in Massive Star-forming Regions for the MYStIX Project.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.209, 32 (2013)

    2013

  10. [10]

    S.et al.The MYStIX Infrared-Excess Source Catalog.Astrophys

    Povich, M. S.et al.The MYStIX Infrared-Excess Source Catalog.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.209, 31 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    E.et al.Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) Colors of Young Stellar Objects

    Allen, L. E.et al.Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) Colors of Young Stellar Objects. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.154, 363–366 (2004)

    2004

  12. [12]

    Elmegreen, B. G. Charbonnel, C. & Montmerle, T. (eds)Triggered Star Forma- tion. (eds Charbonnel, C. & Montmerle, T.)EAS Publications Series, Vol. 51 of EAS Publications Series, 45–58 (2011)

    2011

  13. [13]

    E., Haworth, T

    Dale, J. E., Haworth, T. J. & Bressert, E. The dangers of being trigger-happy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.450, 1199–1211 (2015)

    2015

  14. [14]

    Walsh, J. R. & White, N. J. A cluster of near-infrared sources in the neutral intrusions within M16 (NGC 6611).Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.199, 9P–13 (1982)

    1982

  15. [15]

    L.et al.ISOCAM images of the ‘elephant trunks’ in M16.Astron

    Pilbratt, G. L.et al.ISOCAM images of the ‘elephant trunks’ in M16.Astron. Astrophys.333, L9–L12 (1998)

    1998

  16. [16]

    G.et al.Chandra/ACIS-I Study of the X-Ray Properties of the NGC 6611 and M16 Stellar Populations.Astrophys

    Guarcello, M. G.et al.Chandra/ACIS-I Study of the X-Ray Properties of the NGC 6611 and M16 Stellar Populations.Astrophys. J.753, 117 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    V.et al.Age Gradients in the Stellar Populations of Massive Star Forming Regions Based on a New Stellar Chronometer.Astrophys

    Getman, K. V.et al.Age Gradients in the Stellar Populations of Massive Star Forming Regions Based on a New Stellar Chronometer.Astrophys. J.787, 108 (2014)

    2014

  18. [18]

    A., Urquhart, J

    Thompson, M. A., Urquhart, J. S., Moore, T. J. T. & Morgan, L. K. The statistics of triggered star formation: an overdensity of massive young stellar objects around Spitzer bubbles.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.421, 408–418 (2012)

    2012

  19. [19]

    J.755, 71 (2012)

    Kendrew, S.et al.The Milky Way Project: A Statistical Study of Massive Star Formation Associated with Infrared Bubbles.Astrophys. J.755, 71 (2012)

    2012

  20. [20]

    K.et al.A multiwavelength investigation of the H II region S311: young stellar population and star formation.Mon

    Yadav, R. K.et al.A multiwavelength investigation of the H II region S311: young stellar population and star formation.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.461, 2502–2518 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    E., Ercolano, B

    Dale, J. E., Ercolano, B. & Bonnell, I. A. Ionization-induced star formation - V. Triggering in partially unbound clusters.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.431, 1062–1076 (2013). 20

    2013

  22. [22]

    MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the Construction of Stellar Isochrones.Astrophys

    Dotter, A. MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the Construction of Stellar Isochrones.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.222, 8 (2016)

    2016

  23. [23]

    Choi, J.et al.Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models. Astrophys. J.823, 102 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    A., Massey, P., Strom, S

    Hillenbrand, L. A., Massey, P., Strom, S. E. & Merrill, K. M. NGC 6611: A Cluster Caught in the Act.Astron. J.106, 1906 (1993)

    1906

  25. [25]

    L.et al.The VLT-FLAMES survey of massive stars: stellar parame- ters and rotational velocities in NGC 3293, NGC 4755 and NGC 6611.Astron

    Dufton, P. L.et al.The VLT-FLAMES survey of massive stars: stellar parame- ters and rotational velocities in NGC 3293, NGC 4755 and NGC 6611.Astron. Astrophys.457, 265–280 (2006)

    2006

  26. [26]

    The kinematic history of NGC 6611/M16.Astron

    Stoop, M.et al.The early evolution of young massive clusters. The kinematic history of NGC 6611/M16.Astron. Astrophys.670, A108 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Spitzer, L.Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium(Wiley, 1978)

    1978

  28. [28]

    & Inutsuka, S.-i

    Hosokawa, T. & Inutsuka, S.-i. Dynamical Expansion of Ionization and Disso- ciation Front around a Massive Star. II. On the Generality of Triggered Star Formation.Astrophys. J.646, 240–257 (2006)

    2006

  29. [29]

    J.897, 74 (2020)

    Zhou, J.et al.G15.684-0.29: One of the Largest Galactic Infrared Bubbles Showing Strong Evidence of Triggered Star Formation.Astrophys. J.897, 74 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    J., Lombardi, M

    Lada, C. J., Lombardi, M. & Alves, J. F. On the Star Formation Rates in Molecular Clouds.Astrophys. J.724, 687–693 (2010)

    2010

  31. [31]

    J.et al.The Eagle Nebula’s fingers - pointers to the earliest stages of star formation?Astron

    White, G. J.et al.The Eagle Nebula’s fingers - pointers to the earliest stages of star formation?Astron. Astrophys.342, 233–256 (1999)

    1999

  32. [32]

    L.et al.SOFIA FEEDBACK Survey: The Pillars of Creation in [C II] and Molecular Lines.Astron

    Karim, R. L.et al.SOFIA FEEDBACK Survey: The Pillars of Creation in [C II] and Molecular Lines.Astron. J.166, 240 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    & Sugitani, K

    Fukuda, N., Hanawa, T. & Sugitani, K. Linear Sequences of Starless Cores and Young Stellar Objects in the Eagle Nebula.Astrophys. J. Lett.568, L127–L130 (2002)

    2002

  34. [34]

    F.et al.The Pillars of Creation revisited with MUSE: gas kinematics and high-mass stellar feedback traced by optical spectroscopy.Mon

    McLeod, A. F.et al.The Pillars of Creation revisited with MUSE: gas kinematics and high-mass stellar feedback traced by optical spectroscopy.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.450, 1057–1076 (2015)

    2015

  35. [35]

    Sugitani, K.et al.Near-Infrared Study of M16: Star Formation in the Elephant Trunks.Astrophys. J. Lett.565, L25–L28 (2002)

    2002

  36. [36]

    A., Hillenbrand, L

    Kuhn, M. A., Hillenbrand, L. A., Sills, A., Feigelson, E. D. & Getman, K. V. Kinematics in Young Star Clusters and Associations with Gaia DR2.Astrophys. 21 J.870, 32 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Astrophys.633, A51 (2020)

    Zucker, C.et al.A compendium of distances to molecular clouds in the Star Formation Handbook.Astron. Astrophys.633, A51 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    S.et al.Updated parameters of 1743 open clusters based on Gaia DR2

    Dias, W. S.et al.Updated parameters of 1743 open clusters based on Gaia DR2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.504, 356–371 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    Kimmig, C. N. & Villenave, M. Asymmetric signatures of warps in edge-on disks. Astron. Astrophys.698, A146 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    & Chen, X

    Li, J., Chen, B., Jiang, B., Gao, J. & Chen, X. Probing the Distinct Extinction Law of the Pillars of Creation in M16 with JWST.Astrophys. J. Lett.968, L26 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    StarbugII: JWST PSF photometry for crowded fields

    Nally, C. StarbugII: JWST PSF photometry for crowded fields. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2309.012 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Robitaille, T. P. A modular set of synthetic spectral energy distributions for young stellar objects.Astron. Astrophys.600, A11 (2017)

    2017

  43. [43]

    & Robitaille, T

    Richardson, T., Ginsburg, A., Indebetouw, R. & Robitaille, T. P. An Updated Modular Set of Synthetic Spectral Energy Distributions for Young Stellar Objects. Astrophys. J.961, 188 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    P., Whitney, B

    Robitaille, T. P., Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R. & Wood, K. Interpreting Spectral Energy Distributions from Young Stellar Objects. II. Fitting Observed SEDs Using a Large Grid of Precomputed Models.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.169, 328–352 (2007)

    2007

  45. [45]

    S.et al.Rapid Circumstellar Disk Evolution and an Accelerating Star Formation Rate in the Infrared Dark Cloud M17 SWex.Astrophys

    Povich, M. S.et al.Rapid Circumstellar Disk Evolution and an Accelerating Star Formation Rate in the Infrared Dark Cloud M17 SWex.Astrophys. J.825, 125 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    & Moore, R

    Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P. & Moore, R. Interstellar bubbles. II. Structure and evolution.Astrophys. J.218, 377–395 (1977)

    1977

  47. [47]

    Krumholz, M. R. & Matzner, C. D. The Dynamics of Radiation-pressure- dominated H II Regions.Astrophys. J.703, 1352–1362 (2009)

    2009

  48. [48]

    & Ostriker, E

    Kim, J.-G., Kim, W.-T. & Ostriker, E. C. Disruption of Molecular Clouds by Expansion of Dusty H II Regions.Astrophys. J.819, 137 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    The Physical State of Interstellar Hydrogen.Astrophys

    Str¨ omgren, B. The Physical State of Interstellar Hydrogen.Astrophys. J.89, 526 (1939)

    1939

  50. [50]

    J.et al.The VLT-FLAMES survey of massive stars: Observations in the Galactic clusters NGC 3293, NGC 4755 and NGC 6611.Astron

    Evans, C. J.et al.The VLT-FLAMES survey of massive stars: Observations in the Galactic clusters NGC 3293, NGC 4755 and NGC 6611.Astron. Astrophys. 22 437, 467–482 (2005)

    2005

  51. [51]

    Massey, P., Johnson, K. E. & Degioia-Eastwood, K. The Initial Mass Function and Massive Star Evolution in the OB Associations of the Northern Milky Way. Astrophys. J.454, 151 (1995)

    1995

  52. [52]

    N., Kharchenko, N

    Belikov, A. N., Kharchenko, N. V., Piskunov, A. E. & Schilbach, E. The extremely young open cluster NGC 6611. Luminosity function and star formation history. Astron. Astrophys.358, 886–896 (2000)

    2000

  53. [53]

    G.et al.STARBENCH: the D-type expansion of an H II region.Mon

    Bisbas, T. G.et al.STARBENCH: the D-type expansion of an H II region.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.453, 1324–1343 (2015)

    2015

  54. [54]

    Astrophys.558, A33 (2013)

    Astropy Collaborationet al.Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy.Astron. Astrophys.558, A33 (2013)

    2013

  55. [55]

    J.156, 123 (2018)

    Astropy Collaborationet al.The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package.Astron. J.156, 123 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    J.935, 167 (2022)

    Astropy Collaborationet al.The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package.Astrophys. J.935, 167 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    sedfitter: a Python SED fitting tool—v1.0 release.Zenodohttps: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.235786 (2017)

    Robitaille, T. sedfitter: a Python SED fitting tool—v1.0 release.Zenodohttps: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.235786 (2017)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.235786 2017

  58. [58]

    SAOImage DS9: A utility for displaying astronomical images in the X11 window environment

    Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. SAOImage DS9: A utility for displaying astronomical images in the X11 window environment. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:0003.002 (2000). 23

    2000