Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 87 references

Varying the high-mass end of the IMF changes sodium abundances in galaxies by less than 0.1 dex.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-29 21:11 UTC pith:6Q5Q6UDU

load-bearing objection Their one-zone models show high-mass IMF changes shift sodium by under 0.1 dex mainly because Na yields track oxygen closely. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.26221 v1 pith:6Q5Q6UDU submitted 2026-05-25 astro-ph.GA

Limited imprint of high-mass IMF variations on sodium abundances in main-sequence galaxies

Ziyi Guo , Donatella Romano , Zhiqiang Yan , Zhi-Yu Zhang , Xiaoting Fu , Lizhi Xie , Tereza Jerabkova , Gabriella De Lucia
show 5 more authors
Michaela Hirschmann Fabio Fontanot Eda Gjergo Alice Concas Xiaodong Tang
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords initial mass functionsodium abundancegalactic chemical evolutionstar-forming galaxiesmass-metallicity relationstellar nucleosynthesisIMF diagnostics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests whether systematic changes to the high-mass end of the stellar initial mass function would alter the amount of sodium produced and retained in star-forming galaxies. It runs a one-zone chemical evolution model fed with realistic star-formation histories and tuned to reproduce the observed mass-metallicity relation. The calculation shows that IMF slope or high-mass cutoff adjustments shift sodium levels by under 0.1 dex between 10^9 and 10^11 solar-mass galaxies. The small effect occurs because sodium and oxygen are synthesized in closely comparable stellar sites. A reader would care because the result protects the use of sodium spectral indices as clean IMF diagnostics in population synthesis work.

Core claim

Varying the IMF high-mass end and slope alters the sodium abundance by less than 0.1 dex across galaxies with stellar masses from 10^9 M_⊙ to 10^11 M_⊙. This result is robust under different stellar models and galaxy evolution assumptions, primarily because sodium production is similar to that of oxygen. Sodium abundance is therefore largely insensitive to changes in the high-mass IMF and unlikely to compromise the use of sodium indices as IMF diagnostics in stellar population studies.

What carries the argument

One-zone galactic chemical evolution model that incorporates star formation histories from semi-analytic simulations and is calibrated to match the observed galaxy mass-metallicity relation.

Load-bearing premise

Sodium production is similar to that of oxygen.

What would settle it

Detection of sodium abundance differences larger than 0.1 dex that correlate with independently inferred IMF variations across the same galaxy mass range would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Sodium abundances stay stable even when the high-mass IMF is varied.
  • Sodium-to-oxygen ratios show little sensitivity to high-mass IMF slope or cutoff changes.
  • Sodium spectral indices remain usable as IMF diagnostics without large nucleosynthetic bias.
  • The insensitivity persists across a wide stellar-mass range and under varied model assumptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Elements whose yields diverge more strongly from oxygen's production sites could exhibit larger IMF-driven abundance shifts.
  • Extending the model to low-mass IMF variations would test whether those changes affect sodium more than high-mass variations do.
  • Direct comparison of sodium measurements in galaxies with differing dynamical IMF estimates could provide an observational check.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses a one-zone galactic chemical evolution model, incorporating star-formation histories from semi-analytic simulations and calibrated to the observed galaxy mass-metallicity relation, to quantify the effect of high-mass IMF variations (slope and cutoff) on sodium abundances. It reports that such variations alter sodium abundances by less than 0.1 dex across galaxies with stellar masses 10^9 to 10^11 M_⊙, with the result robust across stellar models primarily because sodium production tracks that of oxygen; the authors conclude that sodium indices remain viable IMF diagnostics.

Significance. If the central result holds, the limited imprint of high-mass IMF variations on [Na/H] would strengthen the reliability of sodium-based IMF diagnostics in stellar population studies by showing that abundance changes do not confound the indices at the 0.1 dex level. The calibration to the mass-metallicity relation and exploration across multiple stellar yield sets are positive aspects that tie the model to observations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods and Results] The load-bearing step for the <0.1 dex bound is the demonstration that the IMF-integrated yield ratio Y_Na/Y_O remains nearly invariant under changes to the high-mass slope or cutoff after MZR calibration. The manuscript states robustness across stellar models but does not appear to include an explicit table or figure of the integrated Na and O yields (or their ratio) for the varied IMFs and yield sets; without this, the quantitative claim cannot be verified from the provided calibration alone.
  2. [Discussion] The assertion that sodium production is similar to oxygen (the primary reason for robustness) is stated qualitatively. A direct comparison of the progenitor-mass dependence of the Na and O yields in the 8–30 M_⊙ range, including any metallicity dependence, is needed to confirm that IMF slope changes do not shift the ratio even after the overall metal enrichment is fixed by the MZR calibration.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section 2] Clarify the exact parametrization of the high-mass IMF (e.g., the range of slopes and cutoffs explored) and how the one-zone model handles the time-dependent enrichment.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract and conclusion could more explicitly note the range of galaxy masses and the specific stellar models tested to make the robustness claim easier to assess.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results on the robustness of sodium abundances to high-mass IMF variations. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested material.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and Results] The load-bearing step for the <0.1 dex bound is the demonstration that the IMF-integrated yield ratio Y_Na/Y_O remains nearly invariant under changes to the high-mass slope or cutoff after MZR calibration. The manuscript states robustness across stellar models but does not appear to include an explicit table or figure of the integrated Na and O yields (or their ratio) for the varied IMFs and yield sets; without this, the quantitative claim cannot be verified from the provided calibration alone.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit visualization of the integrated yields would make the invariance of Y_Na/Y_O more transparent and directly verifiable. In the revised manuscript we will add a new figure (or table) that reports the IMF-integrated Na and O yields and their ratio for the range of high-mass slopes and cutoffs considered, computed after MZR calibration, for each of the stellar yield sets used. This addition will directly support the <0.1 dex claim without altering the underlying model or conclusions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] The assertion that sodium production is similar to oxygen (the primary reason for robustness) is stated qualitatively. A direct comparison of the progenitor-mass dependence of the Na and O yields in the 8–30 M_⊙ range, including any metallicity dependence, is needed to confirm that IMF slope changes do not shift the ratio even after the overall metal enrichment is fixed by the MZR calibration.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the similarity between Na and O production is currently described qualitatively. We will add a new panel (or supplementary figure) that directly plots the progenitor-mass dependence of the Na and O yields over 8–30 M_⊙ for the relevant metallicities, highlighting the parallel behavior that keeps the ratio stable under IMF variations once the MZR fixes the overall enrichment level. This will provide the quantitative support requested while preserving the paper’s central result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central result is a forward-model outcome after MZR calibration.

full rationale

The derivation calibrates a one-zone GCE model to the observed mass-metallicity relation (primarily O-driven), then integrates Na yields under varied high-mass IMF slopes and cutoffs; the <0.1 dex bound on Na abundance is the numerical output of that integration, not a quantity defined by construction from any Na-specific fit. The paper explicitly attributes robustness to the similarity of Na and O production channels across the adopted yield sets, which is an external input rather than a self-referential step. No self-citation load-bearing, uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is present in the abstract or described chain. The result remains falsifiable against independent yield tables and is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the one-zone model, the adopted star-formation histories, the stellar yield tables, and the premise that Na and O yields respond similarly to IMF changes. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • IMF high-mass slope range
    The range of slopes explored is chosen by the authors rather than derived from first principles.
  • calibration parameters for mass-metallicity relation
    The model is tuned to reproduce the observed mass-metallicity relation, introducing parameters that indirectly affect abundance predictions.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Sodium production is similar to that of oxygen across the explored IMF variations
    Explicitly cited as the main reason the abundance change remains small.
  • domain assumption One-zone model with semi-analytic star-formation histories sufficiently captures enrichment
    The modeling framework is adopted without independent validation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5794 in / 1194 out tokens · 28684 ms · 2026-06-29T21:11:34.890695+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Growing evidence suggests that the stellar initial mass function (IMF) varies systematically across galaxies, deviating from the canonical Milky Way form. Such variations would modify the integrated nucleosynthetic yields, and hence the abundance patterns used in stellar population synthesis studies. How these could impact, in particular, the sodium abundance (and sodium-to-oxygen ratios) in star-forming galaxies is not well understood. In this work, we systematically study how high-mass IMF variations affect sodium enrichment using a one-zone galactic chemical evolution model. The model incorporates star formation histories from semi-analytic simulations and is calibrated to match the observed galaxy mass--metallicity relation. We find that varying the IMF high-mass end (and the IMF slope) could only alter the sodium abundance by less than 0.1 dex, across galaxies with stellar masses from $10^9\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$ to $10^{11}\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$. This result is robust under different stellar models and galaxy evolution assumptions, primarily because sodium production is similar to that of oxygen. We conclude that sodium abundance is largely insensitive to changes in the high-mass IMF, unlikely to compromise the use of sodium indices as IMF diagnostics in stellar population studies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26221 by Alice Concas, Donatella Romano, Eda Gjergo, Fabio Fontanot, Gabriella De Lucia, Lizhi Xie, Michaela Hirschmann, Tereza Jerabkova, Xiaodong Tang, Xiaoting Fu, Zhiqiang Yan, Zhi-Yu Zhang, Ziyi Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Hypernova fraction as a function of metallicity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: IMF-weighted yields (per unit initial stellar mass) of oxygen (upper-left), sodium (upper-right), carbon (lower [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Evolution of the SFR (upper-left), surface densities of living stars and gas (upper-right), SN rates (lower-left), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution tracks of [O/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] (left) and [Na/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] (right) for the Solar neighbourhood. The red solid line shows the model adopting N13 massive-star yields(Nomoto et al. 2013), while the purple dashed line adopts LC18 with set M and vrot = 0 km s−1 ; AGB yields are from Karakas (2010). Grey dotted lines indicate the Solar abundances. Observational data are from Amarsi et al. (2019, O), Smi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average SFHs of star-forming galaxies in GAEA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Final gas-phase sodium abundance and sodium-to-oxygen ratio of star-forming galaxy models with different IMF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Final gas-phase sodium abundance and sodium-to-oxygen ratio of star-forming galaxy models with different IMF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Final sodium abundance and final sodium-to-oxygen abundance ratio of our model galaxies as a function of M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Number fraction distribution of stellar sodium abundances at different evolutionary epochs (corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Smith, R

    Alton, P. D., Smith, R. J., & Lucey, J. R. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4464

    2018

  2. [2]

    M., Nissen, P

    Amarsi, A. M., Nissen, P. E., & Skúladóttir, Á. 2019, A&A, 630, A104

    2019

  3. [3]

    & Tosi, M

    Annibali, F. & Tosi, M. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 48

    2022

  4. [4]

    Arnett, W. D. 1971, ApJ, 166, 153

    1971

  5. [5]

    M., & Grevesse, N

    Asplund, M., Amarsi, A. M., & Grevesse, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A141

    2021

  6. [6]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

    2009

  7. [7]

    K., Matteucci, F., Origlia, L., & Rich, R

    Ballero, S. K., Matteucci, F., Origlia, L., & Rich, R. M. 2007, A&A, 467, 123

    2007

  8. [8]

    R., & Meyer, M

    Bastian, N., Covey, K. R., & Meyer, M. R. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 339

    2010

  9. [9]

    K., Dominguez-Sanchez, H., et al

    Bernardi, M., Sheth, R. K., Dominguez-Sanchez, H., et al. 2018, MN- RAS, 477, 2560

    2018

  10. [10]

    2010, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 60, 53

    Broggini, C., Bemmerer, D., Guglielmetti, A., & Menegazzo, R. 2010, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 60, 53

    2010

  11. [11]

    & Charlot, S

    Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000

    2003

  12. [12]

    2008, A&A, 488, 1031

    Caffau, E., Ludwig, H.-G., Steffen, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 1031

    2008

  13. [13]

    Calura, F., Jimenez, R., Panter, B., Matteucci, F., & Heavens, A. F. 2008, ApJ, 682, 252

    2008

  14. [14]

    1999, A&A, 351, 459

    Cappellaro, E., Evans, R., & Turatto, M. 1999, A&A, 351, 459

    1999

  15. [15]

    2003, ApJ, 586, L133 Chávez, R., González-Lópezlira, R

    Chabrier, G. 2003, ApJ, 586, L133 Chávez, R., González-Lópezlira, R. A., & Bruzual, G. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 2989

    2003

  16. [16]

    1997, ApJ, 477, 765

    Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F., & Gratton, R. 1997, ApJ, 477, 765

    1997

  17. [17]

    2001, ApJ, 554, 1044

    Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F., & Romano, D. 2001, ApJ, 554, 1044

    2001

  18. [18]

    J., et al

    Chieffi, A., Courtin, S., deBoer, R. J., et al. 2025, European Physical Journal A, 61, 280

    2025

  19. [19]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 4639

    Chon, S., Ono, H., Omukai, K., & Schneider, R. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 4639

    2022

  20. [20]

    Cinquegrana, G. C. & Karakas, A. I. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 1557

    2022

  21. [21]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 2535

    Concas, A., Maiolino, R., Curti, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 2535

    2022

  22. [22]

    2019, A&A, 622, A188

    Concas, A., Popesso, P., Brusa, M., Mainieri, V., & Thomas, D. 2019, A&A, 622, A188

    2019

  23. [23]

    & van Dokkum, P

    Conroy, C. & van Dokkum, P. G. 2012, ApJ, 760, 71 Côté, B., O’Shea, B. W., Ritter, C., Herwig, F., & Venn, K. A. 2017, ApJ, 835, 128 De Gerónimo, F. C., Miller Bertolami, M. M., Battich, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 259 De Lucia, G., Fontanot, F., Xie, L., & Hirschmann, M. 2024, A&A, 687, A68 De Lucia, G., Tornatore, L., Frenk, C. S., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 44...

    2012

  24. [24]

    2024, A&A, 691, A231

    Deng, Y., Li, H., Liu, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A231

    2024

  25. [25]

    2021, MNRAS, 504, 2190

    Eftekhari, E., Vazdekis, A., & La Barbera, F. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 2190

    2021

  26. [26]

    2021, MNRAS, 504, 4481

    Fontanot, F., Calabrò, A., Talia, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 4481

    2021

  27. [27]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 3812

    Fontanot, F., De Lucia, G., Hirschmann, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3812

    2017

  28. [28]

    2020, MNRAS, 496, 3943

    Fontanot, F., De Lucia, G., Hirschmann, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 3943

    2020

  29. [29]

    S., & Santini, P

    Fontanot, F., De Lucia, G., Monaco, P., Somerville, R. S., & Santini, P. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1776 Article number, page 10 of 17 Ziyi Guo et al.: Limited imprint of high-mass IMF variations on sodium abundances in main-sequence galaxies

    2009

  30. [30]

    2024, A&A, 686, A302

    Fontanot, F., La Barbera, F., De Lucia, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A302

    2024

  31. [31]

    2018, MNRAS, 476, 496

    Fu, X., Bressan, A., Marigo, P., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 496

    2018

  32. [32]

    R., Zhang, H

    Gehren, T., Shi, J. R., Zhang, H. W., Zhao, G., & Korn, A. J. 2006, A&A, 451, 1065

    2006

  33. [33]

    Gilmore, G., Wyse, R. F. G., & Kuijken, K. 1989, ARA&A, 27, 555

    1989

  34. [34]

    E., Newman, A

    Gu, M., Greene, J. E., Newman, A. B., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, 103

    2022

  35. [35]

    Gunawardhana, M. L. P., Hopkins, A. M., Sharp, R. G., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1647

    2011

  36. [36]

    2024, ApJ, 970, 136

    Guo, Z., Zhang, Z.-Y., Yan, Z., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 136

    2024

  37. [37]

    2024, A&A, 689, A221

    Haslbauer, M., Yan, Z., Jerabkova, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A221

    2024

  38. [38]

    & Mauersberger, R

    Henkel, C. & Mauersberger, R. 1993, A&A, 274, 730

    1993

  39. [39]

    2016, MNRAS, 461, 1760

    Hirschmann, M., De Lucia, G., & Fontanot, F. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1760

    2016

  40. [40]

    H., Sormani, M

    Hunter, G. H., Sormani, M. C., Beckmann, J. P., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A216

    2024

  41. [41]

    1999, ApJS, 125, 439

    Iwamoto, K., Brachwitz, F., Nomoto, K., et al. 1999, ApJS, 125, 439

    1999

  42. [42]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.06886 Jeřábková, T., Zonoozi, A

    Jerabkova, T., Romano, D., Kroupa, P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.06886 Jeřábková, T., Zonoozi, A. H., Kroupa, P., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A39

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Karakas, A. I. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1413

    2010

  44. [44]

    1998, ARA&A, 36, 189

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189

    1998

  45. [45]

    C., Somerville, R

    Kim, C.-G., Ostriker, E. C., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 61

    2020

  46. [46]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    2001

  47. [47]

    2002, Science, 295, 82 Kroupa,P.,Gjergo,E.,Jerabkova,T.,&Yan,Z.2026,inEncyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 2, Vol

    Kroupa, P. 2002, Science, 295, 82 Kroupa,P.,Gjergo,E.,Jerabkova,T.,&Yan,Z.2026,inEncyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 2, Vol. 2, 173–210

    2002

  48. [48]

    & Weidner, C

    Kroupa, P. & Weidner, C. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1076 La Barbera, F., Ferreras, I., Vazdekis, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 3017 La Barbera, F., Vazdekis, A., Pasquali, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A64

    2003

  49. [49]

    C., Gil de Paz, A., Tremonti, C., et al

    Lee, J. C., Gil de Paz, A., Tremonti, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 599

    2009

  50. [50]

    2023, Nature, 613, 460

    Li, J., Liu, C., Zhang, Z.-Y., et al. 2023, Nature, 613, 460

    2023

  51. [51]

    & Chieffi, A

    Limongi, M. & Chieffi, A. 2018, ApJS, 237, 13

    2018

  52. [52]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 406

    Lin, L., Zhang, Z.-Y., Wang, J., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 406

    2025

  53. [53]

    2021, ApJ, 920, 5

    Liu, T., Qi, Y.-Q., Cai, Z.-Y., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 5

    2021

  54. [54]

    2016, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 59, 642001

    Liu, W., Li, Z., He, J., et al. 2016, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 59, 642001

    2016

  55. [55]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.00844

    Lodders, K. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.00844

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    & Dickinson, M

    Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415

    2014

  57. [57]

    Maoz, D., Mannucci, F., & Brandt, T. D. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3282

    2012

  58. [58]

    2020, MNRAS, 496, 2962

    Maraston, C., Hill, L., Thomas, D., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 2962

    2020

  59. [59]

    Marinacci, F., Pakmor, R., Springel, V., & Simpson, C. M. 2014, MN- RAS, 442, 3745 Martín-Navarro, I., Vazdekis, A., La Barbera, F., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, L31

    2014

  60. [60]

    2012, Chemical Evolution of Galaxies

    Matteucci, F. 2012, Chemical Evolution of Galaxies

    2012

  61. [61]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., van Zee, L., & Skillman, E. D. 2019, ApJ, 886, 74

    2019

  62. [62]

    2021, ApJ, 910, 114

    Minelli, A., Mucciarelli, A., Romano, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 114

    2021

  63. [63]

    2013, ARA&A, 51, 457

    Nomoto, K., Kobayashi, C., & Tominaga, N. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 457

    2013

  64. [64]

    B., Anglés-Alcázar, D., et al

    Pandya, V., Fielding, D. B., Anglés-Alcázar, D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2979 Papadopoulos,P.P.,Thi,W.-F.,Miniati,F.,&Viti,S.2011,MNRAS, 414, 1705

    2021

  65. [65]

    2018, MNRAS, 476, 3432 Röck, B., Vazdekis, A., La Barbera, F., et al

    Prantzos, N., Abia, C., Limongi, M., Chieffi, A., & Cristallo, S. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 3432 Röck, B., Vazdekis, A., La Barbera, F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 361

    2018

  66. [66]

    I., Tosi, M., & Matteucci, F

    Romano, D., Karakas, A. I., Tosi, M., & Matteucci, F. 2010, A&A, 522, A32

    2010

  67. [67]

    Ivison, R. J. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 401

    2017

  68. [68]

    Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161

    1955

  69. [69]

    1959, ApJ, 129, 243

    Schmidt, M. 1959, ApJ, 129, 243

    1959

  70. [70]

    2016, A&A, 589, A115

    Smiljanic, R., Romano, D., Bragaglia, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 589, A115

    2016

  71. [71]

    C., Bryan, G

    Smith, M. C., Bryan, G. L., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3882

    2021

  72. [72]

    S., Steinhardt, C

    Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15

    2014

  73. [73]

    Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., et al. 2005, Nature, 435, 629

    2005

  74. [74]

    Tang, X. & Ru, L. 2022, in European Physical Journal Web of Con- ferences, Vol. 260, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences (EDP), 01002

    2022

  75. [75]

    A., Heckman, T

    Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 898

    2004

  76. [76]

    & Nomoto, K

    Umeda, H. & Nomoto, K. 2002, ApJ, 565, 385

    2002

  77. [77]

    2016, MNRAS, 463, 3409

    Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., Röck, B., & Falcón-Barroso, J. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3409

    2016

  78. [78]

    & D’Antona, F

    Ventura, P. & D’Antona, F. 2005, A&A, 439, 1075

    2005

  79. [79]

    M., et al

    Williams, M., Lennarz, A., Laird, A. M., et al. 2020, Phys. Rev. C, 102, 035801

    2020

  80. [80]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 4327

    Xie, L., De Lucia, G., Hirschmann, M., & Fontanot, F. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 4327

    2020

Showing first 80 references.