Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Real and Pseudo Dispersion Measures of FRB~20220912A

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2604.01825 v2 pith:5RV5HVYC submitted 2026-04-02 astro-ph.HE

The Real and Pseudo Dispersion Measures of FRB~20220912A

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords realmicroshotspseudodispersionburstsconsistentfrbsintrinsic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond-duration radio transients. As they propagate through the interstellar medium, they interact with free electrons, resulting in dispersion. The corresponding dispersion measure (DM) is referred to as the real DM (DM$_{\rm real}$). In practice, however, the dispersion measure derived from modeling (DM$_{\rm model}$) is often contaminated by intrinsic burst morphology, giving rise to a pseudo DM component (DM$_{\rm pseudo} = {\rm DM}_{\rm model} - {\rm DM}_{\rm real}$). In this work, we focus on the highly active repeating FRB~20220912A and utilize its microshots -- extremely short-duration (typically tens of microseconds), broadband emissions -- to investigate its DM$_{\rm real}$ and DM$_{\rm pseudo}$. We adopt two assumptions: first, that FRB~20220912A resides in a non-magneto-ionic environment and that its DM$_{\rm real}$ variation is smaller than $10^{-2}$\,pc\,cm$^{-3}$ over a few years; and second, that microshots have a negligible intrinsic morphological time delay. By identifying two new microshots and combining them with previously reported ones, we find that all four microshots exhibit remarkably consistent DM values over a one-month timescale, with an average of $219.380 \pm 0.004\,\mathrm{pc\,cm^{-3}}$. We define this value as the DM$_{\rm real}$ of FRB~20220912A. We further show that bright, narrow bursts with a width of less than 2\,ms also yield DM estimates consistent with the microshot-based DM$_{\rm real}$. A survey of five repeating FRBs reveals that DM$_{\rm pseudo}$ is a common phenomenon, with variations typically spanning a range of approximately $10\,\mathrm{pc\,cm^{-3}}$ at 1.2\,GHz. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for morphological contributions in DM interpretation and demonstrate that microshots and narrow bursts are powerful tools for probing DM$_{\rm real}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FAST Polarization Catalog of FRB 20240114A

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A polarization catalog of 6,131 bursts from FRB 20240114A reveals linearly decreasing rotation measure, stable dispersion measure, high linear polarization fractions, low circular polarization, and a broad distributio...

  2. Radio Monitoring Campaign of Active Repeater FRB 20220912A with CHIME

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    FRB 20220912A shows bimodal burst intervals, a 2.3-sigma DM rise of 1.4 pc cm^{-3} yr^{-1}, no RM trend, and possibly unique local environment compared to other repeaters.