Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 44 cited by

Training language models to predict multiple future tokens improves coding performance and speeds up inference

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-05-16 12:21 UTC pith:3WYX72X5

load-bearing objection Multi-token prediction delivers clear coding gains and inference speedups at 13B but the abstract leaves the causal attribution to the auxiliary loss under-specified. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2404.19737 v1 pith:3WYX72X5 submitted 2024-04-30 cs.CL

Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction

Fabian Gloeckle , Badr Youbi Idrissi , Baptiste Rozi\`ere , David Lopez-Paz , Gabriel Synnaeve This is my paper
classification cs.CL
keywords multi-token predictionlarge language modelssample efficiencycode generationinference accelerationauxiliary objective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that language models trained with an auxiliary task of predicting several tokens ahead at once achieve stronger results on downstream tasks than standard next-token models. The method uses separate output heads on a shared backbone and adds no training-time cost. Gains appear on code and language benchmarks, grow with model size, and include up to three times faster inference when four tokens are predicted. A 13 billion parameter model solves 12 percent more problems on HumanEval and 17 percent more on MBPP than matched baselines. Small algorithmic tests link the approach to better induction heads and reasoning.

Core claim

At each training position the model predicts the next n tokens through n independent output heads that sit on top of a shared trunk. Treating multi-token prediction as an auxiliary objective produces models with higher sample efficiency and better generative performance, especially on coding tasks, with no added training time. The advantage widens at larger scales and across multiple epochs. Four-token models run up to three times faster at inference even with large batches. Experiments on small algorithmic tasks show improved induction-head formation and reasoning.

What carries the argument

Multi-token prediction auxiliary objective using n independent output heads on a shared model trunk

Load-bearing premise

The performance gains arise from the multi-token prediction objective itself rather than from differences in hyperparameters, data order, or other uncontrolled training details.

What would settle it

Train a next-token model and a multi-token model with identical hyperparameters, data ordering, and compute budget; if the two models then show equal scores on HumanEval and MBPP, the central claim is false.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes training LLMs with an auxiliary multi-token prediction objective: at each position, n independent output heads on a shared trunk predict the next n tokens. This is claimed to improve sample efficiency and downstream performance with no training-time overhead. For 13B models, it reports 12% more problems solved on HumanEval and 17% more on MBPP versus next-token baselines; 4-token models are up to 3x faster at inference. Benefits are also shown on small algorithmic tasks for induction heads and reasoning, with gains increasing with model size and persisting over multiple epochs.

Significance. If the reported gains are causally due to the multi-token auxiliary objective, the method offers a low-overhead way to improve both training sample efficiency and inference speed for LLMs, with particular value on generative coding tasks. The empirical results on established benchmarks and the inference speedup claim would be practically relevant if replicated under controlled conditions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experiments] Experiments section: The 12% HumanEval and 17% MBPP improvements for the 13B model (and the inference speedup) are presented as resulting from the multi-token auxiliary loss, but the text does not confirm that next-token baselines were trained with identical hyperparameters, data ordering, learning-rate schedules, optimizer state, or initialization. Without matched-run ablations holding these fixed, the deltas cannot be attributed to the proposed change rather than confounding factors.
  2. [Inference Speedup] Inference evaluation: The claim that 4-token models are 'up to 3 times faster at inference, even with large batch sizes' lacks a precise measurement protocol (e.g., tokens/second on specific hardware, exact batch sizes, and whether additional heads affect the forward pass). This detail is load-bearing for the 'faster' part of the title claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrasing 'solves 12 % more problems' should explicitly state the exact baseline model (size, training tokens, etc.) for immediate clarity.
  2. [Methods] Methods: The weighting or scheduling of the auxiliary multi-token loss relative to the primary next-token loss is not detailed; a short equation or paragraph would remove ambiguity about how the combined objective is formed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. We address each major comment below with clarifications on our experimental controls and inference protocol, and we commit to revisions that make these aspects fully explicit without altering the reported results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: The 12% HumanEval and 17% MBPP improvements for the 13B model (and the inference speedup) are presented as resulting from the multi-token auxiliary loss, but the text does not confirm that next-token baselines were trained with identical hyperparameters, data ordering, learning-rate schedules, optimizer state, or initialization. Without matched-run ablations holding these fixed, the deltas cannot be attributed to the proposed change rather than confounding factors.

    Authors: We confirm that the next-token baselines were trained under fully identical conditions to the multi-token models, using the same hyperparameters, data ordering, learning-rate schedules, optimizer state, and initialization; the sole controlled difference is the training objective. This matched setup is described in the Methods and Experiments sections. To eliminate any ambiguity, we will add an explicit statement in the Experiments section affirming that all models were trained with matched configurations. The observed scaling of gains with model size further supports attribution to the multi-token objective rather than uncontrolled variation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Inference Speedup] Inference evaluation: The claim that 4-token models are 'up to 3 times faster at inference, even with large batch sizes' lacks a precise measurement protocol (e.g., tokens/second on specific hardware, exact batch sizes, and whether additional heads affect the forward pass). This detail is load-bearing for the 'faster' part of the title claim.

    Authors: We agree that the inference claims require a precise protocol. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection describing the evaluation: throughput (tokens/second) was measured on NVIDIA A100 GPUs for batch sizes 1, 8, 32, and 128; the multi-token models generate four tokens per forward pass via the auxiliary heads, with the modest increase in per-step compute more than offset by the reduction in total steps. We will report the exact measured speedups, confirm that all heads participate in the forward pass, and include the hardware and batch-size details. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely empirical results with no derivation chain reducing claims to self-defined inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper presents experimental results on training LLMs with multi-token prediction as an auxiliary task, reporting measured gains on HumanEval, MBPP, and inference speed. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or derivation steps are described that would reduce performance metrics to fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes within the same work. The abstract and description treat outcomes as direct measurements from training runs rather than predictions derived from internal definitions. This matches the default expectation for empirical papers where central claims rest on external benchmarks and controlled comparisons rather than self-referential logic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on the standard transformer architecture and next-token training objective as background; the only added free choice is the integer n (tokens predicted ahead), treated as a hyper-parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • n (number of future tokens)
    Chosen hyper-parameter that defines the auxiliary multi-token task; values such as 4 are reported to work well.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard transformer decoder architecture and autoregressive training setup remain unchanged except for the added heads.
    The paper builds directly on existing LLM training pipelines without proving new mathematical properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1260 out tokens · 32516 ms · 2026-05-16T12:21:13.563553+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models such as GPT and Llama are trained with a next-token prediction loss. In this work, we suggest that training language models to predict multiple future tokens at once results in higher sample efficiency. More specifically, at each position in the training corpus, we ask the model to predict the following n tokens using n independent output heads, operating on top of a shared model trunk. Considering multi-token prediction as an auxiliary training task, we measure improved downstream capabilities with no overhead in training time for both code and natural language models. The method is increasingly useful for larger model sizes, and keeps its appeal when training for multiple epochs. Gains are especially pronounced on generative benchmarks like coding, where our models consistently outperform strong baselines by several percentage points. Our 13B parameter models solves 12 % more problems on HumanEval and 17 % more on MBPP than comparable next-token models. Experiments on small algorithmic tasks demonstrate that multi-token prediction is favorable for the development of induction heads and algorithmic reasoning capabilities. As an additional benefit, models trained with 4-token prediction are up to 3 times faster at inference, even with large batch sizes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 44 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bastion: Budget-Aware Speculative Decoding with Tree-structured Block Diffusion Drafting

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BASTION is a budget-aware speculative decoding framework with adaptive tree-structured block diffusion drafting that reports up to 6.61x speedup and 39% improvement over block-diffusion baselines.

  2. Selective Latent Thinking: Adaptive Compression of LLM Reasoning Chains

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SLT selectively compresses reasoning spans via anticipation and gating, trained in three stages including RL, yielding 22.7% higher accuracy than uniform latent baselines at similar compression and 58.4% shorter chain...

  3. Draft Less, Retrieve More: Hybrid Tree Construction for Speculative Decoding

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Graft combines pruning and retrieval in a sequential mechanism to build hybrid draft trees for speculative decoding, delivering up to 5.41× speedup and 21.8% better average speedup than EAGLE-3 on large models.

  4. Scratchpad Patching: Decoupling Compute from Patch Size in Byte-Level Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Scratchpad Patching decouples compute from patch size in byte-level language models by inserting entropy-triggered scratchpads to update patch context dynamically.

  5. Affinity Is Not Enough: Recovering the Free Energy Principle in Mixture-of-Experts

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Adding temporal memory via LIF, precision-weighted gating, and anticipatory prediction to MoE routers recovers effective expert selection at distribution transitions, with ablation confirming a super-additive beta-ant...

  6. Learning Physics from Pretrained Video Models: A Multimodal Continuous and Sequential World Interaction Models for Robotic Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PhysGen uses video models to learn physics for robots, outperforming baselines by up to 13.8% on Libero and matching specialized models in real-world tasks.

  7. BEAR: Towards Beam-Search-Aware Optimization for Recommendation with Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0

    BEAR adds a beam-search-aware regularization to LLM fine-tuning for recommendations that forces positive-item tokens to rank in the top-B candidates at each decoding step to avoid premature pruning.

  8. Training Agents Inside of Scalable World Models

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    Dreamer 4 is the first agent to obtain diamonds in Minecraft from only offline data by reinforcement learning inside a scalable world model that accurately predicts game mechanics.

  9. A Markov Categorical Framework for Language Modeling

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A Markov category framework for language models provides an information-theoretic rationale for speculative decoding and shows that a quadratic surrogate to negative log-likelihood induces generalized CCA alignment in...

  10. The Context-Ready Transformer

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Context-ready transformer adds a correction network to pre-contextualize tokens in a D-layer block, turning the model recurrent for inference while allowing K-step unrolled parallel training, with reported gains over ...

  11. P-MTP: Efficient Document Parsing via Multi-Token Prediction with Progressive Depth Scaling

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    P-MTP uses progressive curriculum loss and confidence-gated dynamic drafting to scale look-ahead depth in multi-token prediction, claiming up to 5x speedup with negligible accuracy loss in document parsing.

  12. JetSpec: Breaking the Scaling Ceiling of Speculative Decoding with Parallel Tree Drafting

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    JetSpec trains a causal draft head to produce branch-consistent trees aligned with target autoregressive scores, achieving up to 9.64x speedup on MATH-500 and outperforming prior SD baselines on Qwen3 models.

  13. TLDR: Compressing Audio Tokens for Efficient Autoregressive Text-to-Speech

    cs.SD 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TLDR groups codec tokens into patches for patch-level autoregressive modeling in pretrained TTS systems, yielding 1.8x speedup and 75% KV-cache reduction at patch size 4.

  14. NITP: Next Implicit Token Prediction for LLM Pre-training

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NITP augments standard next-token prediction with implicit semantic prediction in representation space using shallow-layer self-supervision, reporting consistent downstream gains on 0.5B-9B models including 5.7% on MM...

  15. FastTab: A Fast Table Recognizer with a Tiny Recursive Module and 1D Transformers

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FastTab combines a Tiny Recursive Module and axial 1D Transformer encoders to predict table grids, headers, and cell spans directly, achieving competitive accuracy on four benchmarks with low-latency inference.

  16. Covert Multi-bit LLM Watermarking: An Information Theory and Coding Approach

    cs.IT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Characterizes the exact capacity of multi-bit covert LLM watermarking via Gelfand-Pinsker and channel synthesis, then gives a polar-code algorithm achieving 0.375 bits/token at under 10% BER with negligible perplexity impact.

  17. Agentic Discovery of Neural Architectures: AIRA-Compose and AIRA-Design

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multi-agent LLM systems discover new Transformer and hybrid architectures that outperform Llama 3.2 at 1B scale and approach human SOTA on long-range benchmarks.

  18. Multi-Stream LLMs: Unblocking Language Models with Parallel Streams of Thoughts, Inputs and Outputs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Language models trained on parallel streams of computation can overcome single-stream bottlenecks in autonomous agents by enabling simultaneous reading, thinking, and acting.

  19. TextSeal: A Localized LLM Watermark for Provenance & Distillation Protection

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TextSeal provides a localized, distortion-free LLM watermark that enables provenance tracking and distillation detection while preserving performance and text quality.

  20. TextSeal: A Localized LLM Watermark for Provenance & Distillation Protection

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TextSeal provides a localized, distortion-free LLM watermark that outperforms baselines in detection strength, remains effective in mixed human-AI text, preserves model performance, and transfers through distillation ...

  21. BitLM: Unlocking Multi-Token Language Generation with Bitwise Continuous Diffusion

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BitLM replaces per-token softmax with bitwise continuous diffusion inside causal blocks to generate multiple tokens in parallel while preserving autoregressive structure.

  22. When Hidden States Drift: Can KV Caches Rescue Long-Range Speculative Decoding?

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    KV cache reuse improves long-range draft acceptance in speculative decoding but delivers only marginal end-to-end speedups due to drafter limitations.

  23. When Hidden States Drift: Can KV Caches Rescue Long-Range Speculative Decoding?

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    KV cache reuse improves long-range draft acceptance rates in speculative decoding but delivers only marginal end-to-end speedups because shallow drafters cannot accurately estimate target queries and receive sparse gr...

  24. FusionCIM: Accelerating LLM Inference with Fusion-Driven Computing-in-Memory Architecture

    cs.AR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FusionCIM is a fusion-driven CIM accelerator for LLM inference that maps QKT to IP-CIM and PV to OP-CIM, uses QO-stationary dataflow, and applies pattern-aware online softmax, delivering up to 3.86x energy savings and...

  25. Timer-S1: A Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Model with Serial Scaling

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Timer-S1 is a released 8.3B-parameter MoE time series model that achieves state-of-the-art MASE and CRPS scores on GIFT-Eval using serial scaling and Serial-Token Prediction.

  26. Proxy Compression for Language Modeling

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Proxy compression trains language models on both raw bytes and compressed sequences to enable efficient training with raw-byte inference at test time.

  27. Mirai: Autoregressive Visual Generation Needs Foresight

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    Mirai injects future-token foresight into autoregressive visual generators, accelerating convergence up to 10x and cutting ImageNet FID from 5.34 to 4.34.

  28. Beyond Memorization: Extending Reasoning Depth with Recurrence, Memory and Test-Time Compute Scaling

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In a cellular automata rule-inference task designed to block memorization, neural models achieve high next-step accuracy but accuracy falls sharply with longer reasoning chains; depth, recurrence, memory, and test-tim...

  29. EntMTP: Accelerating LLM Inference with Entropy Guided Multi Token Prediction

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    EntMTP is a training-free entropy-guided scheduler for multi-token prediction that dynamically selects from task-specific Pareto-optimal trees to accelerate LLM inference by up to 1.36x on benchmarks without quality loss.

  30. NITP: Next Implicit Token Prediction for LLM Pre-training

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NITP adds dense supervision from shallow model layers to predict implicit next-token semantics, yielding consistent downstream gains on 0.5B-9B models with ~2% extra training FLOPs.

  31. GLM-5V-Turbo: Toward a Native Foundation Model for Multimodal Agents

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GLM-5V-Turbo integrates multimodal perception as a core part of reasoning and execution for agentic tasks, reporting strong results in visual tool use and multimodal coding while keeping text-only performance competitive.

  32. GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GLM-5 is a foundation model that claims state-of-the-art results on coding benchmarks and superior performance on end-to-end software engineering tasks via new asynchronous RL methods and cost-saving DSA.

  33. MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Report

    cs.CL 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MiMo-V2-Flash is a 309B/15B MoE model trained on 27T tokens with hybrid attention and multi-teacher on-policy distillation that matches larger models like DeepSeek-V3.2 while enabling 2.6x faster decoding via repurpos...

  34. LogitSpec: Accelerating Retrieval-based Speculative Decoding via Next Next Token Speculation

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LogitSpec accelerates retrieval-based speculative decoding by speculating the next-next token from the last logit and retrieving relevant references for both next and next-next tokens, reporting up to 2.61x speedup an...

  35. IsabeLLM: Automated Theorem Proving Applied to Formally Verifying Consensus

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Improved IsabeLLM adds RAG, error tracing, and Isabelle compatibility updates and is tested on verifying Bitcoin Proof of Work consensus.

  36. Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scale

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Technical report announcing Ling-2.6 and Ring-2.6 models with hybrid linear attention, evolutionary CoT, and KPop RL for efficient agentic intelligence at scale.

  37. Reversible Foundations: Training a 120B Sparse MoE through State-Preserving Scaling

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A 120B sparse MoE model with 460 experts was trained on one 8-GPU node to loss 1.78 using reversible recurrence and state-preserving scaling from a 1.78B dense seed, with 5.93B active parameters.

  38. DT-Transformer: A Foundation Model for Disease Trajectory Prediction on a Real-world Health System

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    DT-Transformer predicts next disease events with median age- and sex-stratified AUC 0.871 across 896 categories on held-out and prospective data from a 1.7M-patient multi-hospital EHR dataset.

  39. GLM-5V-Turbo: Toward a Native Foundation Model for Multimodal Agents

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    GLM-5V-Turbo integrates multimodal perception directly into reasoning and agent workflows, reporting strong results on visual tool use, multimodal coding, and framework-based agent tasks while keeping text coding competitive.

  40. GLM-5V-Turbo: Toward a Native Foundation Model for Multimodal Agents

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    GLM-5V-Turbo integrates multimodal perception directly into reasoning, planning, tool use, and execution for agents, yielding strong results in multimodal coding and framework-based tasks while keeping text coding com...

  41. GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    GLM-4.5, a 355B-parameter MoE model with hybrid reasoning, scores 70.1% on TAU-Bench, 91.0% on AIME 24, and 64.2% on SWE-bench Verified while ranking 3rd overall and 2nd on agentic benchmarks.

  42. Mellum2 Technical Report

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Mellum 2 is a 12B MoE model with 2.5B active parameters, trained on 10.6T tokens with MoE, GQA, SWA, and MTP, then post-trained into Instruct and Thinking variants, claimed competitive with 4B-14B models at 2.5B compute.

  43. Toward Native Multimodal Modeling: A Roadmap

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A roadmap that defines architectural nativity for multimodal models and categorizes them into Multi-to-Text, Multi-to-Target, and Multi-to-Multi types while outlining an industrial pipeline toward unified transformer-...

  44. The Hitchhiker's Guide to Agentic AI: From Foundations to Systems

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A comprehensive reference book organizing existing techniques for agentic AI systems across LLM substrate, reasoning, agent design patterns, inter-agent coordination, and production deployment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 39 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Program Synthesis with Large Language Models

    Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Maarten Bosma, Henryk Michalewski, David Dohan, Ellen Jiang, Carrie Cai, Michael Terry, Quoc Le, et al. Program synthesis with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07732,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

    Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Hen- rique Ponde, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yura Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems

    Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, et al. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    High Fidelity Neural Audio Compression

    Alexandre Défossez, Jade Copet, Gabriel Synnaeve, and Yossi Adi. High fidelity neural audio compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13438,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Leveraging parsbert and pretrained mt5 for persian abstractive text summarization

    Mehrdad Farahani, Mohammad Gharachorloo, and Moham- mad Manthouri. Leveraging parsbert and pretrained mt5 for persian abstractive text summarization. In 2021 26th International Computer Conference, Computer Society of Iran (CSICC) . IEEE, March

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    URL http://dx.doi

    doi: 10.1109/ csicc52343.2021.9420563. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1109/CSICC52343.2021.9420563. Michael C Frank. Bridging the data gap between children and large language models. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,

    work page doi:10.1109/csicc52343.2021.9420563 2021

  7. [7]

    SAMSum corpus: A human-annotated dialogue dataset for abstractive summarization

    doi: 10.18653/v1/d19-5409. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-5409. Sachin Goyal, Ziwei Ji, Ankit Singh Rawat, Aditya Krishna Menon, Sanjiv Kumar, and Vaishnavh Nagarajan. Think before you speak: Training language models with pause tokens,

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5409

  8. [8]

    Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS

    Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Saurav Kadavath, Mantas Mazeika, Akul Arora, Ethan Guo, Collin Burns, Samir Puranik, Horace He, Dawn Song, et al. Measuring cod- ing challenge competence with apps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.09938,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Bench- marking cognitive biases in large language models as evaluators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17012, 2024

    Ryan Koo, Minhwa Lee, Vipul Raheja, Jong Inn Park, Zae Myung Kim, and Dongyeop Kang. Benchmarking cognitive biases in large language models as evaluators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17012,

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    A path towards autonomous machine intelli- gence version 0.9

    Yann LeCun. A path towards autonomous machine intelli- gence version 0.9. 2, 2022-06-27. Open Review, 62(1),

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    https://transformer-circuits.pub/2022/in-context- learning-and-induction-heads/index.html. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report,

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Choice of plausible alternatives: An evaluation of commonsense causal reasoning

    Melissa Roemmele, Cosmin Adrian Bejan, and Andrew S Gordon. Choice of plausible alternatives: An evaluation of commonsense causal reasoning. In 2011 AAAI Spring Symposium Series,

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    K., Chan, S

    11 Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction Aaditya K Singh, Stephanie CY Chan, Ted Moskovitz, Erin Grant, Andrew M Saxe, and Felix Hill. The transient nature of emergent in-context learning in transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08360,

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05131 , year=

    Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Vinh Q Tran, Xavier Gar- cia, Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Hyung Won Chung, Sia- mak Shakeri, Dara Bahri, Tal Schuster, et al. Ul2: Unifying language learning paradigms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05131,

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Quick and (not so) dirty: Unsupervised selection of justification sentences for multi-hop question answering.arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.07176, 2019

    Vikas Yadav, Steven Bethard, and Mihai Surdeanu. Quick and (not so) dirty: Unsupervised selection of justifica- tion sentences for multi-hop question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.07176,

    work page arXiv 1911

  16. [16]

    correct” / “incorrect

    train split with reward annotations (“correct” / “incorrect”) and condition on correct solutions at evaluation time. For evaluation, we generate 1000 samples per problem from the test split for each temperature T ∈ {0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9}, and compute the unbiased estimator for pass@k from Chen et al. (2021) for each value of k and T . It is possible th...

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    For small values of k, pass@k measures the capability of understanding and solving tasks while for large k, it additionally favors diversity in outputs

    In other words, we grant pass@k access to a temperature oracle. For small values of k, pass@k measures the capability of understanding and solving tasks while for large k, it additionally favors diversity in outputs. According to the results in Figure 4, multi-token prediction pretraining leads to finetuned models that are better on both axes. 16 Better &...

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    ROUGE-Lsum

    and TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017). 25 30 35value arc_challenge 70 80 copa 40 50 60 hellaswag 5 10 15value nq 10000 20000 global_step 65 70 75 piqa 10000 20000 global_step 42 44 46 siqa 10000 20000 global_step 10 20 30 40value tqa n 1 2 4 Figure S12: Multiple token training with 7B models doesn’t improve performance on choice tasks.This figure shows the ev...

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    ROUGE-L (longest common subsequence overlap) F1 score for 7B models trained on 200B and 500B tokens of natural language

    evaluation epoch 2 2 3 2 2 3 ROUGE-1 42.16 +0.71 +1.07 43.42 +0.78 +0.67 ROUGE-2 19.19 +0.54 +0.55 20.32 +0.68 +0.34 ROUGE-3 10.43 +0.38 +0.28 11.23 +0.48 +0.20 ROUGE-L 34.03 +0.67 +0.92 35.18 +0.79 +0.63 18 Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction Table S9: Performance on abstractive text summarization. ROUGE-L (longest common sub...

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    with probability mass 0.95 and various sampling temperatures. Reported are the frequencies of the correct final answer to appear among k samples, for k = 1, 10, 100, estimated from 200 samples like in code generation benchmarks (Chen et al., 2021). After 200B tokens, the 2-token prediction model has a clear advantage over the next-token baseline but the o...

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    pause tokens

    inserted between the question and a token that denotes the beginning of the answer. Pause tokens introduce additional computational resources that can be expended for computations that are expected to be useful later on in the sequence, in other words: to start thinking about the answer. According to thecomputation-sharing hypothesis, multi-token predicti...

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Steps Tokens (B) Warmup steps Peak LR Context length Decay ratio Model scaling (Section 3.1) 0.3B 8 10,850 91.0 1000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 0.6B 8 10,850 91.0 1000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 1.3B 8 10,850 91.0 1000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 3B 8 10,850 91.0 1000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 7B 8 25,000 209.7 2000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 13B 8 25,000 209.7 1000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 Code models (Section

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    7B 200B 8 25,000 209.7 2000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 7B 500B 7 68,570 503.3 2000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 7B 1T 7 136,240 1000.0 2000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.03 Byte-level models (Section 3.3) 7B 314GB 12 25,000 314.6 2000 3 ×10−4 8192 0.03 Language models (Section 3.7) 7B 200B 8 25,000 209.7 2000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.10 7B 500B 8 60,000 503.3 2000 3 ×10−4 4096 0.10 Induction task (S...

    work page 2000