Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey for Graphic Design Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.01371 v1 pith:IJPXIXR3 submitted 2023-09-04 cs.HC

A Survey for Graphic Design Intelligence

classification cs.HC
keywords designvisualelementsgraphiccompositiondifferentintelligencetasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graphic design is an effective language for visual communication. Using complex composition of visual elements (e.g., shape, color, font) guided by design principles and aesthetics, design helps produce more visually-appealing content. The creation of a harmonious design requires carefully selecting and combining different visual elements, which can be challenging and time-consuming. To expedite the design process, emerging AI techniques have been proposed to automatize tedious tasks and facilitate human creativity. However, most current works only focus on specific tasks targeting at different scenarios without a high-level abstraction. This paper aims to provide a systematic overview of graphic design intelligence and summarize literature in the taxonomy of representation, understanding and generation. Specifically we consider related works for individual visual elements as well as the overall design composition. Furthermore, we highlight some of the potential directions for future explorations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Through the PRISM: Principle-Aware, Interpretable, and Multi-Scale Evaluation of Visual Designs

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PRISM benchmark perturbs Crello layouts into 110K samples isolating design principle violations, reveals limited sensitivity in several multimodal models, and proposes a multi-scale framework combining scorers, instru...