Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dynamic Domain Discrepancy Adjustment for Active Multi-Domain Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.14068 v1 pith:PFIXD3UT submitted 2023-07-26 cs.LG

Dynamic Domain Discrepancy Adjustment for Active Multi-Domain Adaptation

classification cs.LG
keywords domainsourceadaptationdomainsdynamictargetactivemethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-source unsupervised domain adaptation (MUDA) aims to transfer knowledge from related source domains to an unlabeled target domain. While recent MUDA methods have shown promising results, most focus on aligning the overall feature distributions across source domains, which can lead to negative effects due to redundant features within each domain. Moreover, there is a significant performance gap between MUDA and supervised methods. To address these challenges, we propose a novel approach called Dynamic Domain Discrepancy Adjustment for Active Multi-Domain Adaptation (D3AAMDA). Firstly, we establish a multi-source dynamic modulation mechanism during the training process based on the degree of distribution differences between source and target domains. This mechanism controls the alignment level of features between each source domain and the target domain, effectively leveraging the local advantageous feature information within the source domains. Additionally, we propose a Multi-source Active Boundary Sample Selection (MABS) strategy, which utilizes a guided dynamic boundary loss to design an efficient query function for selecting important samples. This strategy achieves improved generalization to the target domain with minimal sampling costs. We extensively evaluate our proposed method on commonly used domain adaptation datasets, comparing it against existing UDA and ADA methods. The experimental results unequivocally demonstrate the superiority of our approach.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.