Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Identifying Ly{α} emitter candidates with Random Forest: learning from galaxies in CANDELS survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.11818 v1 pith:MVEOHAUT submitted 2023-07-21 astro-ph.GA

Identifying Ly{α} emitter candidates with Random Forest: learning from galaxies in CANDELS survey

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords alphagalaxiestextaxislaeslargestaraccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The physical processes which make a galaxy a Lyman Alpha Emitter have been extensively studied for the past 25 years. However, the correlations between physical and morphological properties of galaxies and the strength of the Ly$\alpha$ emission line are still highly debated. Therefore, we investigate the correlations between the rest-frame Ly$\alpha$ equivalent width and stellar mass, star formation rate, dust reddening, metallicity, age, half-light semi-major axis, S\'ersic index and projected axis ratio in a sample of 1578 galaxies in the redshift range $2 \leq z \leq 7.9$ from the GOODS-S, UDS and COSMOS fields. From the large sample of Ly$\alpha$ emitters (LAEs) in the dataset we find that LAEs are typically common main sequence star forming galaxies which show stellar mass $ \leq 10^9 \text{M}_{\odot}$, star formation rate $ \leq 10^{0.5} \text{M}_{\odot}/\text{yr}$, $E(B-V) \leq 0.2$ and half-light semi-major axis $\leq 1 \text{kpc}$. Building on these findings we develop a new method based on Random Forest (i.e. a Machine Learning classifier) in order to select galaxies which have the highest probability of being Ly$\alpha$ emitters. When applied to a population in the redshift range $z \in [2.5, 4.5]$, our classifier holds a $(80 \pm 2)\%$ accuracy and $(73 \pm 4)\%$ precision. At higher redshifts ($z \in [4.5, 6]$), we obtain a $73\%$ accuracy and a $80\%$ precision. These results highlight it is possible to overcome the current limitations in assembling large samples of LAEs by making informed predictions that can be used for planning future large scale spectroscopic surveys.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.