Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Interpretable Sparsification of Brain Graphs: Better Practices and Effective Designs for Graph Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.14375 v1 pith:ZDJNADMA submitted 2023-06-26 cs.LG q-bio.NC

Interpretable Sparsification of Brain Graphs: Better Practices and Effective Designs for Graph Neural Networks

classification cs.LG q-bio.NC
keywords graphgraphsbrainedgeedgesselectionsparsificationclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Brain graphs, which model the structural and functional relationships between brain regions, are crucial in neuroscientific and clinical applications involving graph classification. However, dense brain graphs pose computational challenges including high runtime and memory usage and limited interpretability. In this paper, we investigate effective designs in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to sparsify brain graphs by eliminating noisy edges. While prior works remove noisy edges based on explainability or task-irrelevant properties, their effectiveness in enhancing performance with sparsified graphs is not guaranteed. Moreover, existing approaches often overlook collective edge removal across multiple graphs. To address these issues, we introduce an iterative framework to analyze different sparsification models. Our findings are as follows: (i) methods prioritizing interpretability may not be suitable for graph sparsification as they can degrade GNNs' performance in graph classification tasks; (ii) simultaneously learning edge selection with GNN training is more beneficial than post-training; (iii) a shared edge selection across graphs outperforms separate selection for each graph; and (iv) task-relevant gradient information aids in edge selection. Based on these insights, we propose a new model, Interpretable Graph Sparsification (IGS), which enhances graph classification performance by up to 5.1% with 55.0% fewer edges. The retained edges identified by IGS provide neuroscientific interpretations and are supported by well-established literature.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.