Pith. sign in

REVIEW

COLA: Characterizing and Optimizing the Tail Latency for Safe Level-4 Autonomous Vehicle Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.07147 v1 pith:RQE7GLJ5 submitted 2023-05-11 cs.RO cs.OScs.PF

COLA: Characterizing and Optimizing the Tail Latency for Safe Level-4 Autonomous Vehicle Systems

classification cs.RO cs.OScs.PF
keywords latencysystemstaillevel-4requirementsapolloautonomouscomputation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are envisioned to revolutionize our life by providing safe, relaxing, and convenient ground transportation. The computing systems in such vehicles are required to interpret various sensor data and generate responses to the environment in a timely manner to ensure driving safety. However, such timing-related safety requirements are largely unexplored in prior works. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study to understand the timing requirements of AV systems. We focus on investigating and mitigating the sources of tail latency in Level-4 AV computing systems. We observe that the performance of AV algorithms is not uniformly distributed -- instead, the latency is susceptible to vehicle environment fluctuations, such as traffic density. This contributes to burst computation and memory access in response to the traffic, and further leads to tail latency in the system. Furthermore, we observe that tail latency also comes from a mismatch between the pre-configured AV computation pipeline and the dynamic latency requirements in real-world driving scenarios. Based on these observations, we propose a set of system designs to mitigate AV tail latency. We demonstrate our design on widely-used industrial Level-4 AV systems, Baidu Apollo and Autoware. The evaluation shows that our design achieves 1.65 X improvement over the worst-case latency and 1.3 X over the average latency, and avoids 93% of accidents on Apollo.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.