REVIEW 1 cited by
Investigating Forgetting in Pre-Trained Representations Through Continual Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Investigating Forgetting in Pre-Trained Representations Through Continual Learning
read the original abstract
Representation forgetting refers to the drift of contextualized representations during continual training. Intuitively, the representation forgetting can influence the general knowledge stored in pre-trained language models (LMs), but the concrete effect is still unclear. In this paper, we study the effect of representation forgetting on the generality of pre-trained language models, i.e. the potential capability for tackling future downstream tasks. Specifically, we design three metrics, including overall generality destruction (GD), syntactic knowledge forgetting (SynF), and semantic knowledge forgetting (SemF), to measure the evolution of general knowledge in continual learning. With extensive experiments, we find that the generality is destructed in various pre-trained LMs, and syntactic and semantic knowledge is forgotten through continual learning. Based on our experiments and analysis, we further get two insights into alleviating general knowledge forgetting: 1) training on general linguistic tasks at first can mitigate general knowledge forgetting; 2) the hybrid continual learning method can mitigate the generality destruction and maintain more general knowledge compared with those only considering rehearsal or regularization.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PEFT-MedSAM: Efficient Fine-Tuning of Medical Foundation Models for Explainable Skin Lesion Segmentation
PEFT-MedSAM adapts MedSAM by training only its mask decoder on ISIC 2018 skin lesion data, achieving Dice 0.9411 and outperforming U-Net (0.8715) and zero-shot MedSAM (0.8997), with PH2 validation (0.9467) and 98.27% ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.