Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Deep Learning is Provably Robust to Symmetric Label Noise

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.15083 v1 pith:LKGMPSOA submitted 2022-10-26 stat.ML cs.LG

Deep Learning is Provably Robust to Symmetric Label Noise

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords labelnoisedatasymmetricmitigationnoisydeepdnns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are capable of perfectly fitting the training data, including memorizing noisy data. It is commonly believed that memorization hurts generalization. Therefore, many recent works propose mitigation strategies to avoid noisy data or correct memorization. In this work, we step back and ask the question: Can deep learning be robust against massive label noise without any mitigation? We provide an affirmative answer for the case of symmetric label noise: We find that certain DNNs, including under-parameterized and over-parameterized models, can tolerate massive symmetric label noise up to the information-theoretic threshold. By appealing to classical statistical theory and universal consistency of DNNs, we prove that for multiclass classification, $L_1$-consistent DNN classifiers trained under symmetric label noise can achieve Bayes optimality asymptotically if the label noise probability is less than $\frac{K-1}{K}$, where $K \ge 2$ is the number of classes. Our results show that for symmetric label noise, no mitigation is necessary for $L_1$-consistent estimators. We conjecture that for general label noise, mitigation strategies that make use of the noisy data will outperform those that ignore the noisy data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.