REVIEW
Defects in Halide Perovskites: Does It Help to Switch from 3D to 2D?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Defects in Halide Perovskites: Does It Help to Switch from 3D to 2D?
read the original abstract
Ruddlesden-Popper hybrid iodide 2D perovskites are put forward as stable alternatives to their 3D counterparts. Using first-principles calculations, we demonstrate that equilibrium concentrations of point defects in the 2D perovskites PEA$_2$PbI$_4$, BA$_2$PbI$_4$, and PEA$_2$SnI$_4$ (PEA: phenethyl ammonium, BA: butylammonium), are much lower than in comparable 3D perovskites. Bonding disruptions by defects are more detrimental in 2D than in 3D networks, making defect formation energetically more costly. The stability of 2D Sn iodide perovskites can be further enhanced by alloying with Pb. Should, however, point defects emerge in sizable concentrations as a result of nonequilibrium growth conditions, for instance, then those defects hamper the optoelectronic performance of the 2D perovskites, as they introduce deep traps. We suggest that trap levels are responsible for the broad sub-bandgap emission in 2D perovskites observed in experiments.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.