Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Rethinking Knowledge Distillation via Cross-Entropy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.10139 v1 pith:W6QRFJ75 submitted 2022-08-22 cs.CV

Rethinking Knowledge Distillation via Cross-Entropy

classification cs.CV
keywords losssofttargetproposeteacherscross-entropydistillationdistributed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge Distillation (KD) has developed extensively and boosted various tasks. The classical KD method adds the KD loss to the original cross-entropy (CE) loss. We try to decompose the KD loss to explore its relation with the CE loss. Surprisingly, we find it can be regarded as a combination of the CE loss and an extra loss which has the identical form as the CE loss. However, we notice the extra loss forces the student's relative probability to learn the teacher's absolute probability. Moreover, the sum of the two probabilities is different, making it hard to optimize. To address this issue, we revise the formulation and propose a distributed loss. In addition, we utilize teachers' target output as the soft target, proposing the soft loss. Combining the soft loss and the distributed loss, we propose a new KD loss (NKD). Furthermore, we smooth students' target output to treat it as the soft target for training without teachers and propose a teacher-free new KD loss (tf-NKD). Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on CIFAR-100 and ImageNet. For example, with ResNet-34 as the teacher, we boost the ImageNet Top-1 accuracy of ResNet18 from 69.90% to 71.96%. In training without teachers, MobileNet, ResNet-18 and SwinTransformer-Tiny achieve 70.04%, 70.76%, and 81.48%, which are 0.83%, 0.86%, and 0.30% higher than the baseline, respectively. The code is available at https://github.com/yzd-v/cls_KD.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.