REVIEW
Lost in Context? On the Sense-wise Variance of Contextualized Word Embeddings
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Lost in Context? On the Sense-wise Variance of Contextualized Word Embeddings
read the original abstract
Contextualized word embeddings in language models have given much advance to NLP. Intuitively, sentential information is integrated into the representation of words, which can help model polysemy. However, context sensitivity also leads to the variance of representations, which may break the semantic consistency for synonyms. We quantify how much the contextualized embeddings of each word sense vary across contexts in typical pre-trained models. Results show that contextualized embeddings can be highly consistent across contexts. In addition, part-of-speech, number of word senses, and sentence length have an influence on the variance of sense representations. Interestingly, we find that word representations are position-biased, where the first words in different contexts tend to be more similar. We analyze such a phenomenon and also propose a simple way to alleviate such bias in distance-based word sense disambiguation settings.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.