REVIEW
Comments on "Imaging Reanalyses of EHT Data"
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Comments on "Imaging Reanalyses of EHT Data"
read the original abstract
On June 14, 2022, the EHT collaboration (hereafter EHTC) made the web page (https://eventhorizontelescope.org/blog/imaging-reanalyses-eht-data) with the title "Imaging Reanalyses of EHT Data," in which they made comments on our recent Miyoshi et al .2022 published in the Astrophysical Journal. We investigated the EHTC comments and found that all of the five points raised by the EHTC are subjective and unsubstantiated claims. Thus they do not prove the correctness of the result of EHTC. Sincerely we hope that the EHTC will publish, not a collection of unsubstantiated claims, but a discussion based on scientific arguments.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.