Pith. sign in

REVIEW

High resolution X-ray study of supernova remnant J0453.6-6829 with unusually high forbidden-to-resonance ratio

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.09364 v1 pith:BWO543JQ submitted 2022-04-20 astro-ph.HE

High resolution X-ray study of supernova remnant J0453.6-6829 with unusually high forbidden-to-resonance ratio

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords highj0453ratiocloudforbidden-to-resonancemorphologyoriginratios
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy has revealed that several supernova remnants (SNRs) in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) show unusually high forbidden-to-resonance ($f/r$) line ratios. While their origin is still uncertain and debated, most of these SNRs have asymmetric morphology and/or show evidence of interaction with dense material, which may hint at the true nature of the anomalous $f/r$ ratios. Here we report on a detailed spectral analysis of an LMC SNR J0453.6$-$6829 with the Reflection Grating Spectrometer (RGS) onboard XMM-Newton. We find that the $f/r$ ratio of O$~$VII ($=1.06^{+0.09}_{-0.10}$) is significantly higher than expected from the previously-reported thermal model. The spectrum is fairly explained by taking into account a charge exchange (CX) emission in addition to the thermal component. Analyzing archival ATCA & Parkes radio data, we also reveal that H$~$I cloud is possibly interacting with J0453.6$-$6829. These results support the presence of CX in J0453.6$-$6829, as the origin of the obtained high $f/r$ ratio. Although a contribution of the resonance scattering (RS) cannot be ruled out at this time, we conclude that CX seems more likely than RS considering the relatively symmetric morphology of this remnant.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.