REVIEW 5 cited by
A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learning
read the original abstract
While deep learning (DL) is data-hungry and usually relies on extensive labeled data to deliver good performance, Active Learning (AL) reduces labeling costs by selecting a small proportion of samples from unlabeled data for labeling and training. Therefore, Deep Active Learning (DAL) has risen as a feasible solution for maximizing model performance under a limited labeling cost/budget in recent years. Although abundant methods of DAL have been developed and various literature reviews conducted, the performance evaluation of DAL methods under fair comparison settings is not yet available. Our work intends to fill this gap. In this work, We construct a DAL toolkit, DeepAL+, by re-implementing 19 highly-cited DAL methods. We survey and categorize DAL-related works and construct comparative experiments across frequently used datasets and DAL algorithms. Additionally, we explore some factors (e.g., batch size, number of epochs in the training process) that influence the efficacy of DAL, which provides better references for researchers to design their DAL experiments or carry out DAL-related applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
From Bounding Boxes to Visual Reasoning: An On-Policy Data Annotation Tool for Vision-Language Models
ScreenAnnotator introduces a unified annotation atom schema, on-policy Bayesian verification loop, and template-driven synthesis to generate reusable multi-task reasoning data for VLMs, reporting nearly 100% accept ra...
-
CRAFT: Cost-aware Refinement And Front-aware Tuning of Prompts
CRAFT is a Pareto-front prompt optimizer that allocates scarce LLM validation calls to candidates near the current front using accuracy- and cost-oriented generators plus NSGA-II retention.
-
POCA: Pareto-Optimal Curriculum Alignment for Visual Text Generation
POCA combines Pareto optimization with curriculum alignment to improve multi-reward reinforcement learning for visual text generation without relying on weighted sums.
-
Scaling-Aware Data Selection for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems
MOSAIC is a scaling-aware data selection framework that outperforms baselines in training end-to-end autonomous driving planners, achieving comparable or better EPDMS scores with up to 80% less data.
-
From Model Uncertainty to Human Attention: Localization-Aware Visual Cues for Scalable Annotation Review
Localization uncertainty visualization in AI predictions improves human annotation quality and speed by redirecting effort toward high-uncertainty boxes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.