Pith. sign in

REVIEW

ORDSIM: Ordinal Regression for E-Commerce Query Similarity Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.06591 v1 pith:X6GKG77D submitted 2022-03-13 cs.LG

ORDSIM: Ordinal Regression for E-Commerce Query Similarity Prediction

classification cs.LG
keywords similarityregressionpredictionordsimmodelordinalquerye-commerce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Query similarity prediction task is generally solved by regression based models with square loss. Such a model is agnostic of absolute similarity values and it penalizes the regression error at all ranges of similarity values at the same scale. However, to boost e-commerce platform's monetization, it is important to predict high-level similarity more accurately than low-level similarity, as highly similar queries retrieves items according to user-intents, whereas moderately similar item retrieves related items, which may not lead to a purchase. Regression models fail to customize its loss function to concentrate around the high-similarity band, resulting poor performance in query similarity prediction task. We address the above challenge by considering the query prediction as an ordinal regression problem, and thereby propose a model, ORDSIM (ORDinal Regression for SIMilarity Prediction). ORDSIM exploits variable-width buckets to model ordinal loss, which penalizes errors in high-level similarity harshly, and thus enable the regression model to obtain better prediction results for high similarity values. We evaluate ORDSIM on a dataset of over 10 millions e-commerce queries from eBay platform and show that ORDSIM achieves substantially smaller prediction error compared to the competing regression methods on this dataset.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.