Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Convolutional Nets Versus Vision Transformers for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.06894 v1 pith:ZC2C3IDH submitted 2021-11-12 eess.IV cs.CV

Convolutional Nets Versus Vision Transformers for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classification

classification eess.IV cs.CV
keywords cnnsdemonstratetransformersclassificationconvolutionaldiabeticfootoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper compares well-established Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to recently introduced Vision Transformers for the task of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classification, in the context of the DFUC 2021 Grand-Challenge, in which this work attained the first position. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that modern CNNs are still capable of outperforming Transformers in a low-data regime, likely owing to their ability for better exploiting spatial correlations. In addition, we empirically demonstrate that the recent Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) optimization algorithm considerably improves the generalization capability of both kinds of models. Our results demonstrate that for this task, the combination of CNNs and the SAM optimization process results in superior performance than any other of the considered approaches.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.