Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Which priors matter? Benchmarking models for learning latent dynamics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.05458 v1 pith:QA3QTXXH submitted 2021-11-09 stat.ML cs.LG

Which priors matter? Benchmarking models for learning latent dynamics

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords modelsdynamicsphysicallearningmethodspriorsclassesimages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning dynamics is at the heart of many important applications of machine learning (ML), such as robotics and autonomous driving. In these settings, ML algorithms typically need to reason about a physical system using high dimensional observations, such as images, without access to the underlying state. Recently, several methods have proposed to integrate priors from classical mechanics into ML models to address the challenge of physical reasoning from images. In this work, we take a sober look at the current capabilities of these models. To this end, we introduce a suite consisting of 17 datasets with visual observations based on physical systems exhibiting a wide range of dynamics. We conduct a thorough and detailed comparison of the major classes of physically inspired methods alongside several strong baselines. While models that incorporate physical priors can often learn latent spaces with desirable properties, our results demonstrate that these methods fail to significantly improve upon standard techniques. Nonetheless, we find that the use of continuous and time-reversible dynamics benefits models of all classes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CoMetaPNS: Continually Meta-learning Personalized Neural Surrogates for Cardiac Electrophysiology Simulations

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CoMetaPNS combines meta-learned neural surrogates with a continual Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Model to adapt cardiac electrophysiology simulations to new data while avoiding catastrophic forgetting.

  2. Learning partially observed systems with neural Hamiltonian ordinary differential equations

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NHODE framework learns partially observed dynamical systems by combining Hamiltonian neural networks with neural ODEs, enforcing energy conservation and improving long-horizon stability over data-driven baselines on m...