Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Game-Theoretic Approach for Improving Generalization Ability of TSP Solvers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.15105 v3 pith:LR5VURRY submitted 2021-10-28 cs.LG

A Game-Theoretic Approach for Improving Generalization Ability of TSP Solvers

classification cs.LG
keywords solversframeworkgeneratorperformancesolvertwo-playerabilitydeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce a two-player zero-sum framework between a trainable \emph{Solver} and a \emph{Data Generator} to improve the generalization ability of deep learning-based solvers for Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). Grounded in \textsl{Policy Space Response Oracle} (PSRO) methods, our two-player framework outputs a population of best-responding Solvers, over which we can mix and output a combined model that achieves the least exploitability against the Generator, and thereby the most generalizable performance on different TSP tasks. We conduct experiments on a variety of TSP instances with different types and sizes. Results suggest that our Solvers achieve the state-of-the-art performance even on tasks the Solver never meets, whilst the performance of other deep learning-based Solvers drops sharply due to over-fitting. To demonstrate the principle of our framework, we study the learning outcome of the proposed two-player game and demonstrate that the exploitability of the Solver population decreases during training, and it eventually approximates the Nash equilibrium along with the Generator.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.