Pith. sign in

REVIEW

AgFlow: Fast Model Selection of Penalized PCA via Implicit Regularization Effects of Gradient Flow

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.03273 v1 pith:ZE4MY5XN submitted 2021-10-07 cs.LG stat.ML

AgFlow: Fast Model Selection of Penalized PCA via Implicit Regularization Effects of Gradient Flow

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords penalizedselectionmodelagflowflowgradientregularizationcomputation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Principal component analysis (PCA) has been widely used as an effective technique for feature extraction and dimension reduction. In the High Dimension Low Sample Size (HDLSS) setting, one may prefer modified principal components, with penalized loadings, and automated penalty selection by implementing model selection among these different models with varying penalties. The earlier work [1, 2] has proposed penalized PCA, indicating the feasibility of model selection in $L_2$- penalized PCA through the solution path of Ridge regression, however, it is extremely time-consuming because of the intensive calculation of matrix inverse. In this paper, we propose a fast model selection method for penalized PCA, named Approximated Gradient Flow (AgFlow), which lowers the computation complexity through incorporating the implicit regularization effect introduced by (stochastic) gradient flow [3, 4] and obtains the complete solution path of $L_2$-penalized PCA under varying $L_2$-regularization. We perform extensive experiments on real-world datasets. AgFlow outperforms existing methods (Oja [5], Power [6], and Shamir [7] and the vanilla Ridge estimators) in terms of computation costs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.