Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

KL Guided Domain Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.07780 v2 pith:IMJDUUTA submitted 2021-06-14 cs.LG

KL Guided Domain Adaptation

classification cs.LG
keywords domaintargettrainingadaptationoftenrepresentationsourceadditional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Domain adaptation is an important problem and often needed for real-world applications. In this problem, instead of i.i.d. training and testing datapoints, we assume that the source (training) data and the target (testing) data have different distributions. With that setting, the empirical risk minimization training procedure often does not perform well, since it does not account for the change in the distribution. A common approach in the domain adaptation literature is to learn a representation of the input that has the same (marginal) distribution over the source and the target domain. However, these approaches often require additional networks and/or optimizing an adversarial (minimax) objective, which can be very expensive or unstable in practice. To improve upon these marginal alignment techniques, in this paper, we first derive a generalization bound for the target loss based on the training loss and the reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the source and the target representation distributions. Based on this bound, we derive an algorithm that minimizes the KL term to obtain a better generalization to the target domain. We show that with a probabilistic representation network, the KL term can be estimated efficiently via minibatch samples without any additional network or a minimax objective. This leads to a theoretically sound alignment method which is also very efficient and stable in practice. Experimental results also suggest that our method outperforms other representation-alignment approaches.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Data Difficulty and the Generalization--Extrapolation Tradeoff in LLM Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    For a fixed data budget in LLM supervised fine-tuning, optimal data difficulty shifts toward harder examples as the budget grows because of the tradeoff between in-distribution generalization gap and extrapolation gap.

  2. Data Difficulty and the Generalization--Extrapolation Tradeoff in LLM Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Optimal data difficulty for LLM supervised fine-tuning shifts toward harder examples as data budget increases due to the generalization-extrapolation tradeoff.