Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Uncertainty Baselines: Benchmarks for Uncertainty & Robustness in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.04015 v3 pith:RM4IWJBZ submitted 2021-06-07 cs.LG

Uncertainty Baselines: Benchmarks for Uncertainty & Robustness in Deep Learning

classification cs.LG
keywords methodsuncertaintybaselinesdeeplearningapplicationsestimatesexperiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

High-quality estimates of uncertainty and robustness are crucial for numerous real-world applications, especially for deep learning which underlies many deployed ML systems. The ability to compare techniques for improving these estimates is therefore very important for research and practice alike. Yet, competitive comparisons of methods are often lacking due to a range of reasons, including: compute availability for extensive tuning, incorporation of sufficiently many baselines, and concrete documentation for reproducibility. In this paper we introduce Uncertainty Baselines: high-quality implementations of standard and state-of-the-art deep learning methods on a variety of tasks. As of this writing, the collection spans 19 methods across 9 tasks, each with at least 5 metrics. Each baseline is a self-contained experiment pipeline with easily reusable and extendable components. Our goal is to provide immediate starting points for experimentation with new methods or applications. Additionally we provide model checkpoints, experiment outputs as Python notebooks, and leaderboards for comparing results. Code available at https://github.com/google/uncertainty-baselines.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CalArena: A Large-Scale Post-Hoc Calibration Benchmark

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    CalArena is a large-scale benchmark that evaluates dozens of post-hoc calibration methods using Post-Hoc Improvement (PHI) in proper scoring rules and finds that smooth functions outperform binning while dedicated mul...

  2. When Can Voting Help, Hurt, or Change Course? Exact Structure of Binary Test-Time Aggregation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The voting curve from repeated binary predictions is exactly equivalent to a signed voting signature capturing excess latent mass above the majority threshold at binomial variance scales, via signed Hausdorff moments.

  3. Decision-Aligned Evaluation of Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces decision-alignment to evaluate uncertainty metrics against downstream decision utilities and proposes prior-weighted proper scoring rules that align better in benchmarks and case studies.