Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Renormalized Singles Green's Function in the T-Matrix Approximation for Accurate Quasiparticle Energy Calculation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.14972 v1 pith:AXD4K3TO submitted 2021-05-31 physics.chem-ph

Renormalized Singles Green's Function in the T-Matrix Approximation for Accurate Quasiparticle Energy Calculation

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords textfunctiongreenmethodt-matrixapproximationcoredfas
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We combine the renormalized singles (RS) Green's function with the T-Matrix approximation for the single-particle Green's function to compute quasiparticle energies for valence and core states of molecular systems. The $G_{\text{RS}}T_0$ method uses the RS Green's function that incorporates singles contributions as the initial Green's function. The $G_{\text{RS}}T_{\text{RS}}$ method further calculates the generalized effective interaction with the RS Green's function by using RS eigenvalues in the T-Matrix calculation through the particle-particle random phase approximation. The $G_{\text{RS}}T_{\text{RS}}$ method provides significant improvements over the one-shot T-Matrix method $G_0T_0$ as demonstrated in calculations for GW100 and CORE65 test sets. It also systematically eliminates the dependence of $G_{0}T_{0}$ on the choice of density functional approximations (DFAs). For valence states, the $G_{\text{RS}}T_{\text{RS}}$ method provides an excellent accuracy, which is better than $G_0T_0$ with Hartree-Fock (HF) or other DFAs. For core states, the $G_{\text{RS}}T_{\text{RS}}$ method correctly identifies desired peaks in the spectral function and significantly outperforms $G_0T_0$ on core level binding energies (CLBEs) and relative CLBEs, with any commonly used DFAs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.