Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.05331 v2 pith:FDWALGHB submitted 2021-03-09 stat.ML cs.LG

Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model Evaluation

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords activemodeltestingevaluationtestlabelslearningsample-efficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a new framework for sample-efficient model evaluation that we call active testing. While approaches like active learning reduce the number of labels needed for model training, existing literature largely ignores the cost of labeling test data, typically unrealistically assuming large test sets for model evaluation. This creates a disconnect to real applications, where test labels are important and just as expensive, e.g. for optimizing hyperparameters. Active testing addresses this by carefully selecting the test points to label, ensuring model evaluation is sample-efficient. To this end, we derive theoretically-grounded and intuitive acquisition strategies that are specifically tailored to the goals of active testing, noting these are distinct to those of active learning. As actively selecting labels introduces a bias; we further show how to remove this bias while reducing the variance of the estimator at the same time. Active testing is easy to implement and can be applied to any supervised machine learning method. We demonstrate its effectiveness on models including WideResNets and Gaussian processes on datasets including Fashion-MNIST and CIFAR-100.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM-Based Examination of Eligibility Criteria from Securities Prospectuses at the German Central Bank

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLMs are applied in a generative pipeline for extracting, normalizing, and interpreting eligibility criteria from securities prospectuses, achieving up to 91% precision in document-level decisions with a conservative bias.

  2. Causal Connections: Leveraging Multilingual Fine-Tuning for Financial QA@FinCausal 2026

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Fine-tuned multilingual LLMs achieve top shared-task scores on financial causality extraction in English and Spanish.