Pith. sign in

REVIEW

X-ray Plateaus in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and Their Application in Cosmology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.05627 v4 pith:XHWVEUGU submitted 2020-12-10 astro-ph.HE

X-ray Plateaus in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and Their Application in Cosmology

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords correlationl-t-ex-raycosmologicalcandleconnectscosmologyenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

For gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with a plateau phase in the X-ray afterglow, a so called $L-T-E$ correlation has been found which tightly connects the isotropic energy of the prompt GRB ($E_{\gamma,\rm{iso}}$) with the end time of the X-ray plateau ($T_{a}$) and the corresponding X-ray luminosity at the end time ($L_{X}$). Here we show that there is a clear redshift evolution in the correlation. Furthermore, since the power-law indices of $L_{X}$ and $E_{\gamma,\rm{iso}}$ in the correlation function are almost identical, the $L-T-E$ correlation is insensitive to cosmological parameters and cannot be used as a satisfactory standard candle. On the other hand, based on a sample including 121 long GRBs, we establish a new three parameter correlation that connects $L_{X}$, $T_{a}$ and the spectral peak energy $E_{\rm{p}}$, i.e. the $L-T-E_{\rm{p}}$ correlation. This correlation strongly supports the so-called Combo-relation established by Izzo et al. (2015). After correcting for the redshift evolution, we show that the de-evolved $L-T-E_{\rm{p}}$ correlation can be used as a standard candle. By using this correlation alone, we are able to constrain the cosmological parameters as $\Omega_{m}=0.389^{+0.202}_{-0.141}$ ($1\sigma$) for the flat $\Lambda$CDM model, or $\Omega_{m}=0.369^{+0.217}_{-0.191}$, $w=-0.966^{+0.513}_{-0.678}$ ($1\sigma$) for the flat $w$CDM model. Combining with other cosmological probes, more accurate constraints on the cosmology models are presented.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.