Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Measuring Information Transfer in Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.07624 v2 pith:22FPOVQL submitted 2020-09-16 cs.LG stat.ML

Measuring Information Transfer in Neural Networks

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords informationmodelneurallearninggeneralizablenetworktransfercoding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantifying the information content in a neural network model is essentially estimating the model's Kolmogorov complexity. Recent success of prequential coding on neural networks points to a promising path of deriving an efficient description length of a model. We propose a practical measure of the generalizable information in a neural network model based on prequential coding, which we term Information Transfer ($L_{IT}$). Theoretically, $L_{IT}$ is an estimation of the generalizable part of a model's information content. In experiments, we show that $L_{IT}$ is consistently correlated with generalizable information and can be used as a measure of patterns or "knowledge" in a model or a dataset. Consequently, $L_{IT}$ can serve as a useful analysis tool in deep learning. In this paper, we apply $L_{IT}$ to compare and dissect information in datasets, evaluate representation models in transfer learning, and analyze catastrophic forgetting and continual learning algorithms. $L_{IT}$ provides an information perspective which helps us discover new insights into neural network learning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can In-Context Learning Support Intrinsic Curiosity?

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ICL-derived intrinsic rewards are biased in general MDPs but asymptotically match true learning progress in non-temporal settings, with supporting experiments.