Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Study of Electromagnetic Decays of Orbitally Excited Xi_c Baryons

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.03951 v2 pith:KSOQ7WGY submitted 2020-09-08 hep-ex

Study of Electromagnetic Decays of Orbitally Excited Xi_c Baryons

Belle Collaboration: J.Yelton , I.Adachi , J.K.Ahn , H.Aihara , S.AlSaid , D.M.Asner , T.Aushev , R.Ayad
show 200 more authors
V.Babu S.Bahini pati P.Behera C.Bele J.Bennett V.Bhardwaj B.Bhuyan T.Bilka J.Biswal G.Bonvicini A.Bozek M.Bracko T.E.Browder M.Campajola D.Cervenkov M.-C.Chang P.Chang V.Chekelian A.Chen B.G.Cheon K.Chilikin K.Cho S.-J.Cho S.- K.Choi Y.Choi S.Choudhury D.Cinabro S.Cunliffe G.DeNardo F.DiCapua Z.Dolezal T.V.Dong S.Eidelman D.Epifanov T.Ferber B.G.Fulsom R.Garg V.Gaur N.Gabyshev A.Garmash A.Giri P.Goldenzweig C.Hadjivasiliou O.Hartbrich K.Hayasaka H.Hayashii M.T.Hedges M.HernandezVillanueva W.-S.Hou C.-L.Hsu T.Iijima K.Inami G.Inguglia A.Ishikawa R.Itoh M.Iwasaki Y.Iwasaki W.W.Jacobs S.Jia Y.Jin C.W.Joo K.K.Joo A.B.Kaliyar K.H.Kang G.Karyan Y. Kato T.Kawasaki H.Kichimi C.Kiesling B.H.Kim D.Y.Kim S.H.Kim Y.-K.Kim K.Kinoshita P.Kodys S.Korpar D.Kotchetkov P.Krizan R.Kroeger P.Krokovny R.Kulasiri R.Kumar K.Kumara A.Kuzmin Y.-J.Kwon K.Lalwani J.S.Lange S .C.Lee P.Lewis L.K.Li Y.B.Li L.LiGioi J.Libby K.Lieret Z.Liptak D.Liventsev T.Luo C.MacQueen M.Masuda T. Matsuda D.Matvienko J.T.McNeil M.Merola H.Miyata R.Mizuk G.B.Mohanty S.Mohanty T.J.Moon T.Mori M.Mrvar R. Mussa E.Nakano M.Nakao Z.Natkaniec A.Natochii M.Nayak N.K.Nisar S.Nishida K.Ogawa S.Ogawa H.Ono Y.Onuki P.Oskin P.Pakhlov G.Pakhlova S.Pardi H.Park S.-H.Park S.Patra S.Paul T.K.Pedlar R.Pestotnik L.E.Piilonen T.Podobnik V.Popov E.Prencipe M.T.Prim M.Ritter A.Rostomyan N.Rout G.Russo D.Sahoo Y.Sakai S.Sandilya L.Santelj T.Sanuki V.Savinov G.Schnell J.Schueler C.Schwanda Y.Seino K.Senyo M.E.Sevior M.Shapkin V.Shebalin C.P.Shen J.-G.Shiu B.Shwartz J.B.Singh A.Sokolov E.Solovieva M.Staric Z.S.Stottler J.F.Strube M.Sumihama K.Sumisawa T.Sumiyoshi W.Sutcliffe M.Takizawa U.Tamponi K.Tanida F.Tenchini M.Uchida T.Uglov Y.Unno S.Uno P.Urquijo Y.Usov S.E.Vahsen R.VanTonder G.Varner A.Vinokurova V.Vorobyev E.Waheed C.H.Wang E.Wang M.-Z.Wang P.Wang X.L.Wang M.Watanabe E.Won X.Xu B.D.Yabsley W.Yan S.B.Yang H.Ye J.H.Yin Z.P.Zhang V.Zhilich V.Zhukova V.Zhulanov
This is my paper
classification hep-ex
keywords gammadecaysbaryonsexciteddeviationselectromagneticmeasureprime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using 980 $fb^-1$ of data collected with the Belle detector operating at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e^+e^- collider, we report a study of the electromagnetic decays of excited {charmed baryons} $\Xi_c(2790)$ and $\Xi_c(2815)$. A clear signal (8.6 standard deviations) is observed for $\Xi_c(2815)^0 \to \Xi_c^0\gamma$, and we measure: $B[\Xi_c(2815)^0 \to \Xi_c^0\gamma]/B[\Xi_c(2815)^0 \to \Xi_c(2645)^+\pi^- \to \Xi_c^0\pi^+\pi^-] = 0.41 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.03$. We also present evidence (3.8 standard deviations) for the similar decay of the $\Xi_c(2790)^0$ and measure: $B[\Xi_c(2790)^{0}\to\Xi_c^{0}\gamma]/B[\Xi_c(2790)^0\to\Xi_c^{\prime +}\pi^{-}\to\Xi_c^{+}\gamma \pi^-] = 0.13 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.02$. The first quoted uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. We find no hint of the analogous decays of the $\Xi_c(2815)^+$ and $\Xi_c(2790)^+$ baryons and set upper limits at the 90% confidence level of: $B[\Xi_c(2815)^{+}\to\Xi_c^{+}\gamma]/B[\Xi_c(2815)^+\to\Xi_c(2645)^0\pi^+\to\Xi_c^+\pi^-\pi^+] < 0.09,$ and $B[\Xi_c(2790)^{+}\to\Xi_c^{+}\gamma]/B[\Xi_c(2790)^+\to\Xi_c^{\prime 0}\pi^{+}\to\Xi_c^{0}\gamma \pi^+] < 0.06.$ Approximate values of the partial widths of the decays are extracted, which can be used to discriminate between models of the underlying quark structure of these excited states.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.