Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Deep Learning of Subsurface Flow via Theory-guided Neural Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.00103 v1 pith:KOIYGHZK submitted 2019-10-24 cs.LG stat.ML

Deep Learning of Subsurface Flow via Theory-guided Neural Network

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords tgnnlearningmodelneuraldataengineeringnetworkflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Active researches are currently being performed to incorporate the wealth of scientific knowledge into data-driven approaches (e.g., neural networks) in order to improve the latter's effectiveness. In this study, the Theory-guided Neural Network (TgNN) is proposed for deep learning of subsurface flow. In the TgNN, as supervised learning, the neural network is trained with available observations or simulation data while being simultaneously guided by theory (e.g., governing equations, other physical constraints, engineering controls, and expert knowledge) of the underlying problem. The TgNN can achieve higher accuracy than the ordinary Artificial Neural Network (ANN) because the former provides physically feasible predictions and can be more readily generalized beyond the regimes covered with the training data. Furthermore, the TgNN model is proposed for subsurface flow with heterogeneous model parameters. Several numerical cases of two-dimensional transient saturated flow are introduced to test the performance of the TgNN. In the learning process, the loss function contains data mismatch, as well as PDE constraint, engineering control, and expert knowledge. After obtaining the parameters of the neural network by minimizing the loss function, a TgNN model is built that not only fits the data, but also adheres to physical/engineering constraints. Predicting the future response can be easily realized by the TgNN model. In addition, the TgNN model is tested in more complicated scenarios, such as prediction with changed boundary conditions, learning from noisy data or outliers, transfer learning, and engineering controls. Numerical results demonstrate that the TgNN model achieves much better predictability, reliability, and generalizability than ANN models due to the physical/engineering constraints in the former.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.