Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Classification Calibration for Long-tail Instance Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.13081 v3 pith:LT27LBMI submitted 2019-10-29 cs.CV

Classification Calibration for Long-tail Instance Segmentation

classification cs.CV
keywords calibrationclassificationinstanceperformancesegmentationclassesdatasetdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Remarkable progress has been made in object instance detection and segmentation in recent years. However, existing state-of-the-art methods are mostly evaluated with fairly balanced and class-limited benchmarks, such as Microsoft COCO dataset [8]. In this report, we investigate the performance drop phenomenon of state-of-the-art two-stage instance segmentation models when processing extreme long-tail training data based on the LVIS [5] dataset, and find a major cause is the inaccurate classification of object proposals. Based on this observation, we propose to calibrate the prediction of classification head to improve recognition performance for the tail classes. Without much additional cost and modification of the detection model architecture, our calibration method improves the performance of the baseline by a large margin on the tail classes. Codes will be available. Importantly, after the submission, we find significant improvement can be further achieved by modifying the calibration head, which we will update later.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.