Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Radio Interferometric Calibration Using a Complex Student's t-distribution and Wirtinger Derivatives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.08136 v1 pith:O4CKZUOC submitted 2019-10-17 astro-ph.IM

Radio Interferometric Calibration Using a Complex Student's t-distribution and Wirtinger Derivatives

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords calibrationalgorithmradiointerferometriccomplexconventionaldatafrequency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Radio interferometric gain calibration can be biased by incomplete sky models and radio frequency interference, resulting in calibration artefacts that can restrict the dynamic range of the resulting images. It has been suggested that calibration algorithms employing heavy-tailed likelihood functions are less susceptible to this due to their robustness against outliers in the data. We present an algorithm based on a Student's t-distribution which leverages the framework of complex optimisation and Wirtinger calculus for efficient and robust interferometric gain calibration. We integrate this algorithm as an option in the newly released calibration software package, CubiCal. We demonstrate that the algorithm can mitigate some of the biases introduced by incomplete sky models and radio frequency interference by applying it to both simulated and real data. Our results show significant improvements compared to a conventional least-squares solver which assumes a Gaussian likelihood function. Furthermore, we provide some insight into why the algorithm outperforms the conventional solver, and discuss specific scenarios (for both direction-independent and direction-dependent self-calibration) where this is expected to be the case.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.