Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

NormLime: A New Feature Importance Metric for Explaining Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.04200 v2 pith:XQANTSVB submitted 2019-09-10 cs.LG stat.ML

NormLime: A New Feature Importance Metric for Explaining Deep Neural Networks

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords modelsnormlimeglobalinterpretationslocalclass-specificdeepeffective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of explaining deep learning models, and model predictions generally, has attracted intensive interest recently. Many successful approaches forgo global approximations in order to provide more faithful local interpretations of the model's behavior. LIME develops multiple interpretable models, each approximating a large neural network on a small region of the data manifold and SP-LIME aggregates the local models to form a global interpretation. Extending this line of research, we propose a simple yet effective method, NormLIME for aggregating local models into global and class-specific interpretations. A human user study strongly favored class-specific interpretations created by NormLIME to other feature importance metrics. Numerical experiments confirm that NormLIME is effective at recognizing important features.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fundamental Limitation in Explaining AI

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A claimed mathematical proof establishes a quadrilemma showing that complex environments, high AI performance, interpretable explanations, and complete faithfulness cannot coexist.