Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On Reverberation Mapping Lag Uncertainties

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.03072 v2 pith:ZVJTBRGS submitted 2019-09-06 astro-ph.GA

On Reverberation Mapping Lag Uncertainties

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords lightcurvecontinuumjavelinmethodsystematicerrorerrorsestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We broadly explore the effects of systematic errors on reverberation mapping lag uncertainty estimates from {\tt JAVELIN} and the interpolated cross-correlation function (ICCF) method. We focus on simulated lightcurves from random realizations of the lightcurves of five intensively monitored AGNs. Both methods generally work well even in the presence of systematic errors, although {\tt JAVELIN} generally provides better error estimates. Poorly estimated lightcurve uncertainties have less effect on the ICCF method because, unlike {\tt JAVELIN}, it does not explicitly assume Gaussian statistics. Neither method is sensitive to changes in the stochastic process driving the continuum or the transfer function relating the line lightcurve to the continuum. The only systematic error we considered that causes significant problems is if the line lightcurve is not a smoothed and shifted version of the continuum lightcurve but instead contains some additional sources of variability.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.