REVIEW
Reply to a comment on `Understanding the gamma-ray emission from the globular cluster 47 Tuc: evidence for dark matter?'
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reply to a comment on `Understanding the gamma-ray emission from the globular cluster 47 Tuc: evidence for dark matter?'
read the original abstract
Analysing 9 years of Fermi-LAT observations, we recently studied the spectral properties of the prominent globular cluster 47 Tuc (Brown et al. 2018). In particular, we investigated several models to explain the observed gamma-ray emission, ranging from millisecond pulsars (MSP) to Dark Matter (DM), with the motivation for the latter model driven by recent evidence that 47 Tuc harbours an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH). This investigation found evidence that the observed gamma-ray emission from 47 Tuc is due to two source populations of MSPs and DM. In Bartels \& Edwards (2018), the authors comment that this evidence is an artifact of the MSP spectra used in (Brown et al. 2019). Here we reply to this comment and argue that the authors of Bartels \& Edwards (2018) (i) do not give due consideration to a very important implication of their result and (ii) there is tension between our MSP fit and their MSP fit when taking uncertainties into consideration. As such, we still conclude there is evidence for a DM component which motivates a deeper radio study of the prominent globular cluster 47 Tuc.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.