Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.04164 v2 pith:YCQ4PER4 submitted 2019-07-09 cs.LG stat.ML

Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic Model

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords batchcriticalnetworkneuraloptimizationresultssizesizes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Increasing the batch size is a popular way to speed up neural network training, but beyond some critical batch size, larger batch sizes yield diminishing returns. In this work, we study how the critical batch size changes based on properties of the optimization algorithm, including acceleration and preconditioning, through two different lenses: large scale experiments, and analysis of a simple noisy quadratic model (NQM). We experimentally demonstrate that optimization algorithms that employ preconditioning, specifically Adam and K-FAC, result in much larger critical batch sizes than stochastic gradient descent with momentum. We also demonstrate that the NQM captures many of the essential features of real neural network training, despite being drastically simpler to work with. The NQM predicts our results with preconditioned optimizers, previous results with accelerated gradient descent, and other results around optimal learning rates and large batch training, making it a useful tool to generate testable predictions about neural network optimization.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know

    cs.CL 2022-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Language models show good calibration when asked to estimate the probability that their own answers are correct, with performance improving as models get larger.

  2. A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment

    cs.CL 2021-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    Ranked preference modeling outperforms imitation learning for language model alignment and scales more favorably with model size.

  3. Scaling Laws for Transfer

    cs.LG 2021-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Effective data transferred from pre-training to fine-tuning is described by a power law in model parameter count and fine-tuning dataset size, acting like a multiplier on the fine-tuning data.