Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Assembly bias evidence in close galaxy pairs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.03266 v1 pith:QDBIGQPV submitted 2019-05-08 astro-ph.GA

Assembly bias evidence in close galaxy pairs

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxiesmasssatellitesmassivesatelliteclosepairsprimaries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The growth channel of massive galaxies involving mergers can be studied via close pairs as putative merger progenitors, where the stellar populations of the satellite galaxies will be eventually incorporated into the massive primaries. We extend our recent analysis of the GAMA-based sample of close pairs presented in Ferreras et al. to the general spectroscopic dataset of SDSS galaxies (DR14), for which the high S/N of the data enables a detailed analysis of the differences between satellite galaxies with respect to the mass of the primary galaxy. A sample of approximately two thousand satellites of massive galaxies is carefully selected within a relatively narrow redshift range (0.07<z<0.14). Two main parameters are considered as major drivers of the star formation history of these galaxies, namely: the stellar velocity dispersion of the satellite ($\sigma$), as a proxy of "local" drivers, and the ratio between the stellar mass of the satellite and the primary, $\mu=M_{\rm SAT}/M_{\rm PRI}$, meant to serve as an indicator of environment. Consistently with the independent, GAMA-based work, we find that satellites around the most massive primaries appear older, at fixed velocity dispersion, with respect to satellites of lower mass primaries. This trend is more marked in lower mass satellites ($\sigma$~100 km/s), with SSP-equivalent age differences up to ~0.5 Gyr, and can be interpreted as a one-halo assembly bias, so that satellites corresponding to smaller values of the mass ratio $\mu$ represent older structures, akin to fossil groups.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.