Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Compare Contact Model-based Control and Contact Model-free Learning: A Survey of Robotic Peg-in-hole Assembly Strategies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.05240 v1 pith:JNGFJJRS submitted 2019-04-10 cs.RO

Compare Contact Model-based Control and Contact Model-free Learning: A Survey of Robotic Peg-in-hole Assembly Strategies

classification cs.RO
keywords contactlearningassemblyroboticcontrolmodel-freepeg-in-holestrategies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present an overview of robotic peg-in-hole assembly and analyze two main strategies: contact model-based and contact model-free strategies. More specifically, we first introduce the contact model control approaches, including contact state recognition and compliant control two steps. Additionally, we focus on a comprehensive analysis of the whole robotic assembly system. Second, without the contact state recognition process, we decompose the contact model-free learning algorithms into two main subfields: learning from demonstrations and learning from environments (mainly based on reinforcement learning). For each subfield, we survey the landmark studies and ongoing research to compare the different categories. We hope to strengthen the relation between these two research communities by revealing the underlying links. Ultimately, the remaining challenges and open questions in the field of robotic peg-in-hole assembly community is discussed. The promising directions and potential future work are also considered.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning Hybrid-Control Policies for High-Precision In-Contact Manipulation Under Uncertainty

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MATCH trains hybrid position-force RL policies that achieve up to 10% higher success rates and 5x fewer breaks than pose-only policies in fragile peg-in-hole tasks under localization uncertainty, with strong sim-to-re...

  2. Visual-Tactile Peg-in-Hole Assembly Learning from Peg-out-of-Hole Disassembly

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A visual-tactile RL method learns peg-in-hole assembly from reversed peg-out-of-hole disassembly trajectories, reaching 87.5% success on seen objects and 77.1% on unseen objects while lowering contact forces.

  3. Robust and Resilient Soft Robotic Object Insertion with Compliance-Enabled Contact Formation and Failure Recovery

    cs.RO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A passively compliant soft wrist structures insertion as sequential contact formations and uses a VLM to recover from failures, reaching 83% success in simulation across randomized grasp, pose, friction, and shape var...