Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Performance Comparison of Contemporary DNN Watermarking Techniques

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.03713 v1 pith:24CZCEUT submitted 2018-11-08 cs.MM

Performance Comparison of Contemporary DNN Watermarking Techniques

classification cs.MM
keywords watermarkingmodelcomparisonperformanceschemetechniquesaccordingaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

DNNs shall be considered as the intellectual property (IP) of the model builder due to the impeding cost of designing/training a highly accurate model. Research attempts have been made to protect the authorship of the trained model and prevent IP infringement using DNN watermarking techniques. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive performance comparison of the state-of-the-art DNN watermarking methodologies according to the essential requisites for an effective watermarking technique. We identify the pros and cons of each scheme and provide insights into the underlying rationale. Empirical results corroborate that DeepSigns framework proposed in [4] has the best overall performance in terms of the evaluation metrics. Our comparison facilitates the development of pending watermarking approaches and enables the model owner to deploy the watermarking scheme that satisfying her requirements.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.