Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dual Reconstruction Nets for Image Super-Resolution with Gradient Sensitive Loss

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.07099 v1 pith:F37YT3YE submitted 2018-09-19 cs.CV

Dual Reconstruction Nets for Image Super-Resolution with Gradient Sensitive Loss

classification cs.CV
keywords imagedeeplearninglossperformancegradientimagesreconstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks have exhibited promising performance in image super-resolution (SR) due to the power in learning the non-linear mapping from low-resolution (LR) images to high-resolution (HR) images. However, most deep learning methods employ feed-forward architectures, and thus the dependencies between LR and HR images are not fully exploited, leading to limited learning performance. Moreover, most deep learning based SR methods apply the pixel-wise reconstruction error as the loss, which, however, may fail to capture high-frequency information and produce perceptually unsatisfying results, whilst the recent perceptual loss relies on some pre-trained deep model and they may not generalize well. In this paper, we introduce a mask to separate the image into low- and high-frequency parts based on image gradient magnitude, and then devise a gradient sensitive loss to well capture the structures in the image without sacrificing the recovery of low-frequency content. Moreover, by investigating the duality in SR, we develop a dual reconstruction network (DRN) to improve the SR performance. We provide theoretical analysis on the generalization performance of our method and demonstrate its effectiveness and superiority with thorough experiments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.