Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the stability of many-body localization in d>1

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.01475 v3 pith:TR2G2BIY submitted 2018-05-03 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mech

On the stability of many-body localization in d>1

classification cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords ergodicavalanchebubbleregionlargeandersonback-actioncoupled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work by De Roeck et al. [Phys. Rev. B 95, 155129 (2017)] has argued that many-body localization (MBL) is unstable in two and higher dimensions due to a thermalization avalanche triggered by rare regions of weak disorder. To examine these arguments, we construct several models of a finite ergodic bubble coupled to an Anderson insulator of non-interacting fermions. We first describe the ergodic region using a GOE random matrix and perform an exact diagonalization study of small systems. The results are in excellent agreement with a refined theory of the thermalization avalanche that includes transient finite-size effects, lending strong support to the avalanche scenario. We then explore the limit of large system sizes by modeling the ergodic region via a Hubbard model with all-to-all random hopping: the combined system, consisting of the bubble and the insulator, can be reduced to an effective Anderson impurity problem. We find that the spectral function of a local operator in the ergodic region changes dramatically when coupling to a large number of localized fermionic states---this occurs even when the localized sites are weakly coupled to the bubble. In principle, for a given size of the ergodic region, this may arrest the avalanche. However, this back-action effect is suppressed and the avalanche can be recovered if the ergodic bubble is large enough. Thus, the main effect of the back-action is to renormalize the critical bubble size.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.