Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Nebular Spectroscopy of the `Blue Bump' Type Ia Supernova 2017cbv

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.03666 v2 pith:FRJV4J6V submitted 2018-04-10 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Nebular Spectroscopy of the `Blue Bump' Type Ia Supernova 2017cbv

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords companionstaralphatimesblueemissionlightnondegenerate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present nebular phase optical and near-infrared spectroscopy of the Type Ia supernova (SN) 2017cbv. The early light curves of SN~2017cbv showed a prominent blue bump in the $U$, $B$ and $g$ bands lasting for $\sim$5 d. One interpretation of the early light curve was that the excess blue light was due to shocking of the SN ejecta against a nondegenerate companion star -- a signature of the single degenerate scenario. If this is the correct interpretation, the interaction between the SN ejecta and the companion star could result in significant H$\alpha$ (or helium) emission at late times, possibly along with other species, depending on the companion star and its orbital separation. A search for H$\alpha$ emission in our +302 d spectrum yields a nondetection, with a $L_{H\alpha}$$<$8.0$\times$10$^{35}$ erg/s (given an assumed distance of $D$=12.3 Mpc), which we have verified by implanting simulated H$\alpha$ emission into our data. We make a quantitative comparison to models of swept-up material stripped from a nondegenerate companion star, and limit the mass of hydrogen that might remain undetected to $M_{\rm H} < 1 \times 10^{-4}$ $\rm M_{\odot}$. A similar analysis of helium star related lines yields a $M_{\rm He} < 5 \times 10^{-4}$ $\rm M_{\odot}$. Taken at face value, these results argue against a nondegenerate H or He-rich companion in Roche lobe overflow as the progenitor of SN 2017cbv. Alternatively, there could be weaknesses in the envelope-stripping and radiative transfer models necessary to interpret the strong H and He flux limits.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.