Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.09168 v1 pith:XC7AI4TP submitted 2017-07-28 cs.CL

Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis

classification cs.CL
keywords taskchargechargeslegalpredictionrelevantappropriatearticles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The charge prediction task is to determine appropriate charges for a given case, which is helpful for legal assistant systems where the user input is fact description. We argue that relevant law articles play an important role in this task, and therefore propose an attention-based neural network method to jointly model the charge prediction task and the relevant article extraction task in a unified framework. The experimental results show that, besides providing legal basis, the relevant articles can also clearly improve the charge prediction results, and our full model can effectively predict appropriate charges for cases with different expression styles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enhancing Judgment Document Generation via Agentic Legal Information Collection and Rubric-Guided Optimization

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Judge-R1 improves LLM judgment document generation by combining agentic legal information retrieval with GRPO-based rubric-guided optimization, outperforming baselines on the JuDGE benchmark.