Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The cooling, mass and radius of the neutron star in EXO 0748-676 in quiescence with XMM-Newton

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1706.04784 v1 pith:GHKWFA6M submitted 2017-06-15 astro-ph.HE

The cooling, mass and radius of the neutron star in EXO 0748-676 in quiescence with XMM-Newton

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutron-starmassradiusbest-fittingdistancefitsaroundassumed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyse four XMM-Newton observations of the neutron-star low-mass X-ray binary EXO 0748$-$676 in quiescence. We fit the spectra with an absorbed neutron-star atmosphere model, without the need for a high-energy (power-law) component; with a 95 per cent confidence the power-law contributes less than 1 per cent to the total flux of the source in $0.5-10.0$ keV. The fits show significant residuals at around 0.5 keV which can be explained by either a hot gas component around the neutron star or a moderately broad emission line from a residual accretion disc. The temperature of the neutron-star has decreased significantly compared to the previous observation, from 124 eV to 105 eV, with the cooling curve being consistent with either an exponential decay plus a constant or a (broken) power law. The best-fitting neutron-star mass and radius can be better constrained if we extend the fits down to the lowest possible energy available. For an assumed distance of 7.1 kpc, the best-fitting neutron-star mass and radius are $2.00_{-0.24}^{+0.07}~M_\odot$ and $11.3_{-1.0}^{+1.3}$ km if we fit the spectrum over the $0.3-10$ keV range, but $1.50_{-1.0}^{+0.4}~M_\odot$ and $12.2_{-3.6}^{+0.8}$ km if we restrict the fits to the $0.5-10$ keV range. We finally discuss the effect of the assumed distance to the source upon the best-fitting neutron-star mass and radius. As systematic uncertainties in the deduced mass and radius depending on the distance are much larger than the statistical errors, it would be disingenuous to take these results at face value.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.