Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Joint Beamforming and Feature Detection for Enhanced Visualization of Spinal Bone Surfaces in Ultrasound Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1609.01483 v1 pith:JUCMDAHS submitted 2016-09-06 physics.med-ph physics.bio-ph

Joint Beamforming and Feature Detection for Enhanced Visualization of Spinal Bone Surfaces in Ultrasound Images

classification physics.med-ph physics.bio-ph
keywords boneimagesbeamformerdetectionframeworkstandardsurfaceanatomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a framework for extracting the bone surface from B-mode images employing the eigenspace minimum variance (ESMV) beamformer and a ridge detection method. We show that an ESMV beamformer with a rank-1 signal subspace can preserve the bone anatomy and enhance the edges, despite an image which is less visually appealing due to some speckle pattern distortion. The beamformed images are post-processed using the phase symmetry (PS) technique. We validate this framework by registering the ultrasound images of a vertebra (in a water bath) against the corresponding Computed Tomography (CT) dataset. The results show a bone localization error in the same order of magnitude as the standard delay-and-sum (DAS) technique, but with approximately 20% smaller standard deviation (STD) of the image intensity distribution around the bone surface. This indicates a sharper bone surface detection. Further, the noise level inside the bone shadow is reduced by 60%. In in-vivo experiments, this framework is used for imaging the spinal anatomy. We show that PS images obtained from this beamformer setup have sharper bone boundaries in comparison with the standard DAS ones, and they are reasonably well separated from the surrounding soft tissue.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.