Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On Calibration of Three-axis Magnetometer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1509.02046 v1 pith:4624AMG2 submitted 2015-09-07 cs.RO

On Calibration of Three-axis Magnetometer

classification cs.RO
keywords magnetometercalibrationmethodsthree-axisapproximateattitudeestimationmeasurements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Magnetometer has received wide applications in attitude determination and scientific measurements. Calibration is an important step for any practical magnetometer use. The most popular three-axis magnetometer calibration methods are attitude-independent and have been founded on an approximate maximum likelihood (ML) estimation with a quartic subjective function, derived from the fact that the magnitude of the calibrated measurements should be constant in a homogeneous magnetic field. This paper highlights the shortcomings of those popular methods and proposes to use the quadratic optimal ML estimation instead for magnetometer calibration. Simulation and test results show that the optimal ML calibration is superior to the approximate ML methods for magnetometer calibration in both accuracy and stability, especially for those situations without sufficient attitude excitation. The significant benefits deserve the moderately increased computation burden. The main conclusion obtained in the context of magnetometer in this paper is potentially applicable to various kinds of three-axis sensors.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.