Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison between security majors in virtual machine and linux containers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1507.07816 v1 pith:RNY6XZDW submitted 2015-07-28 cs.CR

Comparison between security majors in virtual machine and linux containers

classification cs.CR
keywords securitymachinesvirtualcontainercontainersdifferentdomainhaving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Virtualization started to gain traction in the domain of information technology in the early 2000s when managing resource distribution was becoming an uphill task for developers. As a result, tools like VMWare, Hyper V (hypervisor) started making inroads into the software repository on different operating systems. VMWare and Hyper V could support multiple virtual machines running on them with each having their own isolated environment. Due to this isolation, the security aspects of virtual machines (VMs) did not differ much from that of physical machines (having a dedicated operating system on hardware). The advancement made in the domain of linux containers (LXC) has taken virtualization to an altogether different level where resource utilization by various applications has been further optimized. But the container security has assumed primary importance amongst the researchers today and this paper is inclined towards providing a brief overview about comparisons between security of container and VMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.