Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The redshift distribution of submillimetre galaxies at different wavelengths

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1407.0721 v2 pith:TNAEFB4Q submitted 2014-07-02 astro-ph.GA

The redshift distribution of submillimetre galaxies at different wavelengths

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxiesdistributionredshiftdifferentparentpopulationdistributionssame
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using simulations we demonstrate that some of the published redshift distributions of submillimetre galaxies (SMGs) at different wavelengths, which were previously reported to be statistically different, are consistent with a parent distribution of the same population of galaxies. The redshift distributions which peak at z_med=2.9, 2.6, 2.2, 2.2, and 2.0 for galaxies selected at 2 and 1.1 mm, and 870, 850, and 450 um respectively, can be derived from a single parent redshift distribution, in contrast with previous studies. The differences can be explained through wavelength selection, depth of the surveys, and to a lesser degree, angular resolution. The main differences are attributed to the temperature of the spectral energy distributions, as shorter-wavelength maps select a hotter population of galaxies. Using the same parent distribution and taking into account lensing bias we can also reproduce the redshift distribution of 1.4 mm-selected ultra-bright galaxies, which peaks at z_med=3.4. However, the redshift distribution of 450 um-selected galaxies in the deepest surveys, which peaks at z_med=1.4, cannot be reproduced from the same parent population with just these selection effects. In order to explain this distribution we have to add another population of galaxies or include different selection biases.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.